Anteroposterior skeletal change: Growth modification

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-32

  Evans, Carla A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038584946     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1073-8746(00)80006-7     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Evans CA. Mechanisms of facial growth. In: Shaw JH, Sweeney EA, Meller SA, Capuccino CC (eds). Textbook of Oral Biology. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, pp 55-109, 1978.
2. Evans CA. Growth and development in orthodontics. Curr Opin Dentist 1992;2:19-27.
3. Evans CA. Postnatal facial growth, birth through postadolcscence. In: Avery JK (ed) : Oral Development and Histology. New York, NY. Thieme Medical Publishers (Chap 4) pp 58-67, 1994.
4. Brodie AG. On the growth pattern of the human head from the third month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat 1941;68:209-262.
5. Tulloch JF, Philips C, Proffit WR. Benefits of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113: 62-72.
6. Bushang PH, Tanguay R, La Palme L, Demirjian A. Mandibular growth prediction: Mean growth increments vs. mathematical models. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:290-296.
7. Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:340-347.
8. Fischer TJ. The cervical facebow and mandibular rotation. Angle Orthod 1980;50:54-62.
9. Doppel DM, Damon WM, Joondeph DR, Little RM. An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994:105-161-168.
10. Efstratiadis SS, Cohen G, Ghafari J. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions. Angle Orthod 1999;69:225-230.
11. Bookstein FL. Tensor biometrics for changes in cranial shape. Ann Hum Biol 1984;11:413-437.
12. Kusnoto B, Evans CA, BeGole EA, de Rijk W. Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999;116: 390-399.
13. Meldrum RJ. Alterations in the upper facial growth of Macaca mulatta resulting from high-pull headgear. Am J Orthod 1975;67:393-411.
14. Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:197-205.
15. Caldwell SF, Hymas TA, Timm TA. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984;85: 376-384.
16. Uner O, Yucel-Eroglu E. Effects of a modified maxillary orthopaedic splint: A cephalometric evaluation. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:269-286.
17. Triftshauser R, Walters RD. Cervical retraction of the maxillae in the Macaca mulatta monkey using heavy orthopedic force. Angle Orthod 1976;46:37-46.
18. Droschl H. The effect of heavy orthopedic forces on the suture of the facial bones. Angle Orthod 1975;45:26-33.
19. Melsen B. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: An implant study. Am J Orthod 1978;73:526-40.
20. Derringer K. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1-Skeletal changes. Br J Orthod 1990;17:33-16.
21. Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S. Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth. Am J Orthod 1985;88:288-296.
22. Cook AH, Sellke TA, BeGole EA. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:376-388.
23. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Haavikko K. Changes in dental arch dimensions by use of an orthopedic cervical headgear in Class II correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:59-66.
24. Hubbard GW, Nanda RS, Currier GF. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1994;64:359-370.
25. Burke M, Jacobson A. Vertical changes in high-angle Class II division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:501-508.
26. Funk AC. Mandibular response to headgear therapy and its clinical significance. Am J Orthod 1967;53:182-216.
27. Harvold E, Vargervik K. Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1971;60:479-490.
28. Stochli R, Willert H. Tissue reactions in the temporomandibular joint resulting from anterior displacement of the mandible in the monkey. Am J Orthod 1971;60:141-155.
29. McNamara JA Jr, Bryan FA. Long-term mandibular adaptations to protrusive function: An experimental study in Macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:98-108.
30. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, et al. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:51-61.
31. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:40-50.
32. McNamara JA Jr, Peterson JE Jr, Alexander RG. Threedimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 1996;2:114-137.
33. Ozturk Y, Tankuter N. Class II: A comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:149-157.
34. Levin RI. Activator headgear therapy. Am J Orthod 1985;877:91-109.
35. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: A cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:510-520.
36. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 1997;3:232-43.
37. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: A cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:437-446.
38. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusion with a headgear-Hcrbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984;86:1-13.
39. Wicslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:319-329.
40. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:181-198.
41. Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: A long-term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:657-668.
42. Paulsen HU, Rabol A, Sorensen SS. Bone scintigraphy of human temporomandibular joints during Herbst treatment: A case report. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:369-374.
43. Kambara T. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus. Am J Orthod 1977;71: 249-277.
44. Jackson GW, Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestina. Am J Orthod 1979;75:318-333.
45. Smalley WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, et al. Osseointegrated titanium iplants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:285-295.
46. Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei SH. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:151-168.
47. Nartallo-Turley PE, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class HI malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1998;68:217-224.
48. Kilicoglu H, KirlicY. Profile changes in patients with class III malocclusions after Delaire mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:453-462.
49. Chong YH, Ive JC, Artun J. Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1996;66:351-362.
50. Takada K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class HI children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: A longitudinal cephalometric appraisal. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:211-221.
51. Kim JH, Viana MA, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA. The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: A meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115: 675-685.
52. Nanda R. Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear. Am J Orthod 1980;78:125-139.
53. Allen RA, Connolly IH, Richardson A. Early treatment of incisor relationship using the chincap appliance. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:371-376.
54. Thilander B. Chin-cap treatment for Angle Cl. III malocclusion: A longitudinal study. Trans Europ Orthod Soc 1965;311-427.
55. Vego L. Early orthopedic treatment of Cl. III skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod 1976;70:59-69.
56. Graber, L. Chin cup therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977;72:23-41.
57. Dcguchi T, McNamara J. Craniofacial adaptation induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999;115:175-182.
58. Joho JP. The effects of extraoral low-pull traction to themandibular dentition of Macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod 1973;64:555-577.
59. Matsumoto N. Effects of low-pull traction to the mandibular first molars on craniofacial growth in Macaca irus monkey. J Osaka Dent Univ 1987;21:55-80.
60. Battagel JM, Orton HS. A comparative study of the effects of customized facemask therapy or headgear to the lower arch on the developing Class III face. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:467-482.
61. Orton HS, Sullivan PG, Battagel JM, Orton S. The management of class III and class III tendency occlusions using headgear to the mandibular dentition. Br J Orthod 1983;10:2-12.
62. Battagel JM, Orton HS. Class III malocclusion: The post-retention findings following a non-extraction treatment approach. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:45-55.
63. Arun T, Erverdi N. A cephalometric comparison of mandibular headgear and chin-cup appliances in orthodontic and orthopaedic view points. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac 1994;2:392-398.