Public perceptions and attitudes towards a current managed realignment scheme: Brancaster West Marsh, North Norfolk, U.K.

Journal of Coastal Research

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 278-286

  Myatt, L B ^a   Scrimshaw, M D ^a   Lester, J N ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brancaster; Coastal defence; Managed realignment; Public perception

Indexed keywords

COASTAL PROTECTION; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0038580686     PISSN: 07490208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. COLLINS, D., 2001. The policy context of coastal realignment. Proceedings from The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management Conference on Coastal Realignment (London), 8p.
2. DANIEL, H., 2001. Replenishment versus retreat: the cost of maintaining Delaware's beaches. Ocean and Coastal Management, 44, 87-104.
3. DILLMAN, D., 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley, 464p.
4. DIXON, M., 2002. Personal Communication. 24/01/02. In: MYATT, L.B., Public Perceptions and Attitudes Towards U.K. Managed Realignment Schemes. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, PhD thesis (in preparation).
5. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY, NORTH NOFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL, KING'S LYNN & WEST NORFOLK BOROUGH COUNCIL, MAFF, and ENGLISH NATURE, 1996. North Norfolk Shoreline Management Plan. Sheringham to Snettisham Scalp. Surrey: Mouchel.
6. FORDHAM, M. 1992. Choice and Constraint in Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Environmental Attitudes of Floodplain Residents and Engineers. Middlesex Polytechnic, PhD thesis, 466p.
7. FORDHAM, M.; TUNSTALL, S., and PENNING-ROWSELL, E., 1991. Choice and preference in the Thames floodplain: the beginnings of a participatory approach? Landscape and Urban Planning, 20, 183-187.
8. FRENCH, P., 1999. Managed retreat: a natural analogue from the Medway estuary, UK. Ocean and Coastal Management, 42, 49-62.
9. French, P.W., 2001. Coastal Defences: Processes Problems and Solutions. London: Routledge, 366p.
10. GREEN, C. and PENNING-ROWSELL, E., 1999. Inherent conflicts at the coast. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 5, 153-162.
11. HOUSE, M., 1996. Public perception and water quality management. Water Science Technology, 34(12), 25-32.
12. HOUSE, M. and FORDHAM, M., 1992. Public perception of river corridors and attitudes towards river works. Publication No.24, Paper presented at the River Landscapes: Environmental Partnerships in Practice. Egham, Surrey: Flood Hazard Research Centre.
13. HOWELL, J., 2001. Personal communication. 16/6/01. In: MYATT, L.B., Public Perceptions and Attitudes Towards U.K. Managed Realignment Schemes. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, PhD thesis (in preparation).
14. KING, S. and LESTER, J., 1995. The value of salt marsh as a sea defence. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 30(3), 180-189.
15. MÖLLER, I.; SPENCER, T.; FRENCH, J.; LEGGETT, D., and DIXON, M., 2001. The sea-defence value of salt marshes: field evidence from North Norfolk. Journal of the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management, 15(2), 109-116.
16. MYATT-BELL, L.B.; SCRIMSHAW, M.D.; LESTER, J.N., and POTTS, J., 2002. Public perception of managed realignment: Brancaster West Marsh, North Norfolk, U.K. Marine Policy, 26, 45-57.
17. ORDNANCE SURVEY, 2002. Landranger 132. North West Norfolk & King's Lynn & Fakenham. London: HMSO, scale 1:25,000.
18. OPPENHEIM, A., 1992. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter Publishers, 303p.
19. PETHICK, J., 1998. Brancaster West Marsh - Assessment of Partial Retreat Option. Accessed from the Brancaster files at the Environment Agency H.Q., Ipswich. Environment Agency Reports STCG29. 5p.
20. PRICE, M. 2002. Who needs sustainability? In: HISCOCK, K.; RIVETT, M. and DAVISON, R. (Eds.), Sustainable Groundwater Development. London: Geological Society. Special publications, pp. 75-81.
21. SARANTAKOS, S., 1993. Social Research. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 480p.
22. TAPSELL, S.; FORDHAM, M.; TUNSTALL, S., and HORNE, M., 1994. The River Environment and You: Postal Survey Datchet to Walton Bridge. Final report to the National Rivers Authority. Enfield: Middlesex University, Flood Hazard Research Centre. 115p.
23. TUNSTALL, S., 2000. Public perception of the environmental changes to the Thames Estuary in London, U.K. Journal of Coastal Research, 16(2), 269-277.
24. nd Meeting of the European Chapter of the Society for Risk Analysis. Vienna. March 1990. Enfield: Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre, 20p.
25. TUNSTALL, S.; TAPSELL, S., and EDEN, S., 1999. How stable are public responses to changing local environments? A 'before' & 'after' case study of river restoration. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(4), 527-547.
26. TUNSTALL, S.; TAPSELL, S., and FORDHAM, M., 1994. Public Perception of Rivers and Flood Defence: Final Report. Marlow, Buckinghamshire: Foundation for Water Research. National Rivers Authority Research and Development Note 445. 12p.
27. TUNSTALL, S.; TAPSELL, S., and WILLS, J., 1997. Public perceptions of flood risk, rivers and flood defence. Proceedings of 32nd MAFF Conference of Rivers and Coastal Engineers. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Keel University 2-4 July 1997, pp. J.2.1-J.2.12.
28. TYRRELL, K. and DIXON, M., 2000. Brancaster West Marsh Engineers Report. Final Draft May 2000. Ipswich: Environment Agency, 75p.
29. WIEDEMANN, P.M. and FEMERS, S., 1993. Public participation in waste management decision making: analysis and management conflicts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 33, 355-368.
30. YATES, F., 1981. Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys. London: Griffin, 450p.