Repair versus replacement for degenerative mitral valve disease with coexisting ischemic heart disease

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 125, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1350-1361

  Gillinov, A Marc ^a   Faber, Christiano ^a   Houghtaling, Penny L ^a   Blackstone, Eugene H ^a   Lam, Buu Khanh ^a   Diaz, Ramon ^a   Lytle, Bruce W ^a   Sabik III, Joseph F ^a   Cosgrove III, Delos M ^a   David, Tirone E ^b   Adams, David H ^b   Isom, O Wayne ^b   Bodnar, Endre ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Cleveland Clinic Foundation ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL;

EID: 0038579257     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(02)73274-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH, Diaz R, Arnold JH, Lytle BW, et al. Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:734-43.
2. Cohn LH, Couper GS, Aranki SF, Rizzo RJ, Kinchla NM, Collins JJ Jr. Long-term results of mitral valve reconstruction for regurgitation of the myxomatous mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:143-51.
3. David TE, Armstrong S, Sun Z, Daniel L. Late results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to degenerative disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:7-12.
4. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery - the "French correction." J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323-37.
5. Sand ME, Naftel DC, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Karp RB. A comparison of repair and replacement for mitral valve incompetence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;94:208-19.
6. Lee EM, Shapiro LM, Wells FC. Superiority of mitral valve repair in surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 1997;18: 655-63.
7. Akins CW, Hilgenberg AD, Buckley MJ, Vlahakes GJ, Torchiana DF, Daggett WM, et al. Mitral valve reconstruction versus replacement for degenerative or ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 58:668-76.
8. Galloway AC, Colvin SB, Baumann FG, Grossi EA, Ribakove GH, Harty S, et al. A comparison of mitral valve reconstruction with mitral valve replacement: intermediate-term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989; 47:655-62.
9. Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation. 1995;91:1022-8.
10. Mohty D, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Avierinos JF, Tajik JA, Enriquez-Sarano M. Very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse. Circulation. 2001;104:11-7.
11. Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG. Cardiac surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p. 415-22.
12. Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, Bishay ES, Cosgrove DM, White J, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1125-41.
13. Berkson J, Gage RP. Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1950;25:270-86.
14. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning. 1996;26:123-40.
15. Blackstone EH. Breaking down barriers: helpful breakthrough statistical methods you need to understand better. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:430-9.
16. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
17. Blackstone EH. Comparing apples and oranges. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:8-15.
18. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:516-24.
19. Parsons LS. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. In: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SAS users group international conference. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc; 2001. p. 214-26.
20. D'Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265-81.
21. Drake C, Fisher L. Prognostic models and the propensity score. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:183-7.
22. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-81.
23. Blackstone EH, Naftel DC, Turner ME Jr. The decomposition of time-varying hazard into phases, each incorporating a separate stream of concomitant information. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:615-24.
24. Cohn LH, Couper GS, Kinchla NM, Collins JJ Jr. Decreased operative risk of surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation with or without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1575-8.
25. Lauer MS, Blackstone EH, Young JB, Topol EJ. Cause of death in clinical research: time for a reassessment? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34:618-20.
26. Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, Abdallah F, Celestin JA, Meimoun P, et al. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier's techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation. 2001;104:18-11.