The transfer of occlusal forces through the maxillary molars: A finite element study

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 367-373

  Cattaneo, Paolo M ^a   Dalstra, Michel ^a   Melsen, Birte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FACIAL BONE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; SKELETON; ZYGOMA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; JAW; MASSETER MUSCLE; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; ROTATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH ROOT; WEIGHT BEARING;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL OCCLUSION; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MASSETER MUSCLE; MAXILLA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLAR; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; ROTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOOTH ROOT; WEIGHT-BEARING; ZYGOMA;

EID: 0038576284     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.73     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos 1899;XLI:350-7.
2. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309.
3. Johnston LE Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatment: a retrospective/prospective alternative. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:42-6.
4. Brickmann CD, Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:526-34.
5. Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distilization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:639-46.
6. Cetlin N, ten Hoeve A. Nonextraction treatment. J Clin Orthod 1983;17:396-413.
7. Haas AJ. Headgear therapy: the most efficient way to distalize molars. Semin Orthod 2000;6:79-90.
8. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:40-50.
9. Angle EH. Malocclusion of the teeth. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Manufacturing; 1907.
10. Kloehn SJ. Guiding alveolar growth and eruption of the teeth to reduce treatment time and produce a more balanced denture and face. Angle Orthod 1947;17:10-33.
11. McSherry PF, Bradley H. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod 2000;27:219-25.
12. Melsen B. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod 1978;73:526-40.
13. Björk A. The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. Am J Phys Anthropol 1969;29:243-54.
14. Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption - an implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972;62:339-83.
15. Helman M. An interpretation of Angle's classification of malocclusion of the teeth supported by evidence from comparative anatomy and evolution. Dent Cosmos 1920;LXII:476-95.
16. Atkinson SR. The mesio-buccal root of the maxillary first molar. Am J Orthod 1951;38:642-52.
17. Wheeler RC. An atlas of tooth form. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1969.
18. Liu D, Melsen B. Reappraisal of Class II molar relationships diagnosed from the lingual side. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:97-104.
19. Gross MD, Arbel G, Hershkovitz I. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the facial skeleton on simulated occlusal loading. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:684-94.
20. Jinushi H, Suzuki T, Naruse T, Isshiki Y. A dynamic study of the effect on the maxillofacial complex of the face bow: analysis by a three-dimensional finite element method. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1997;38:33-41.
21. Tanne K, Hiraga J,Kakiuchi K, Yamagata Y, Sakuda M. Biomechanical effect of anteriorly directed extraoral forces on the craniofacial complex: a study using the finite element method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:200-7.
22. Garland M. Quadric-based polygonal surface simplification [thesis]. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University; 1999.
23. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Frich LH. A three-dimensional finite element model from computed tomography data: a semi-automated method. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2001;215:203-13.
24. Esses S, Lotz JC, Hayes WC. Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single-energy quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Min Res 1989;4:715-21.
25. Harp JH, Aronson J, Hollis M. Non-invasive determination of bone stiffness for distraction osteogenesis by computed tomography scans. Clin Orthop 1994;301:42-8.
26. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 1988;21:155-68.
27. Schaffler MB, Burr DB. Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. J Biomech 1988;21:13-6.
28. Tuxen A, Bakke M, Pinholt EM. Comparative data from young men and women on masseter muscle fibers, function and facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1999;44:509-18.
29. Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S. Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth. Am J Orthod 1985;88:288-96.
30. Melsen B, Dalstra M. Distal molar movement with Kloehn headgear: is it stable? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:374-8.
31. Seipel CM. Trajectories of the jaw. Acta Odontol Scand 1948;8:81-191.