Feeding and oviposition behavior do not explain Douglas-fir resistance to defoliation by the western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 626-632

  Palermo, Barbara L ^a   Clancy, Karen M ^b   Koch, George W ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Choristoneura occidentalis; Douglas fir; Feeding behavior; Oviposition behavior; Resistance

Indexed keywords

DEFOLIATION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; OVIPOSITION; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION;

ABIES; CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA; CHORISTONEURA OCCIDENTALIS; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; PICEA; PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; TORTRICIDAE;

EID: 0038573740     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-32.3.626     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix7 user's manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL.
2. Blake, E. A., and M. R. Wagner. 1986. Foliage age as a factor in food utilization by the western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis. Great Basin Nat. 46: 169-172.
3. Burr, K. E., and K. M. Clancy. 1993. Douglas-fir needle anatomy in relation to western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) herbivory. J. Econ. Entomol. 86: 93-99.
4. Campbell, R. W., T. R. Torgersen, and N. Srivastava. 1984. Number and size of eggs in egg masses of the western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Entomol. 116: 657-661.
5. Carolin, V. M. 1987. Life history and behavior, pp. 29-42. In M. H. Brookes, R. W. Campbell, J. J. Colbert, R. G. Mitchell and R. W. Stark [eds.], Western spruce budworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Ser. Tech. Bull. 1694, Washington, D.C.
6. Chen, Z., T. E. Kolb, and K. M. Clancy. 2001a. Mechanisms of Douglas-fir resistance to western spruce budworm defoliation: bud burst phenology, photosynthetic compensation and growth rate. Tree Physiol. 21: 1159-1169.
7. Chen, A., T. E. Kolb, K. M. Clancy, V. D. Hipkins, and L. E. DeWald. 2001b. Allozyme variation in interior Douglas-fir: association with growth and resistance to western spruce budworm herbivory. Can J. For. Res. 31: 1691-1700.
8. Chen, Z., T. E. Kolb, and K. M. Clancy. 2002. The role of monoterpenes in resistance of Douglas fir to western spruce budworm defoliation. J. Chem. Ecol. 28: 897-920.
9. Chen, Z., K. M. Clancy, and T. E. Kolb. 2003. Variation in budburst phenology of Douglas-fir related to western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) fitness. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 377-387.
10. Clancy, K. M. 1991. Multiple-generation bioassay for investigating western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) nutritional ecology. Environ. Entomol. 20: 1363-1374.
11. Clancy, K. M. 2001. Biochemical characteristics of Douglas-fir trees resistant to damage from the western spruce budworm: patterns from three populations, pp. 115-125. In R. I. Alfero, K. Day, S. Salem, K.S.S. Nair, H. Evans, A. Liebhold, F. Lieutier, M. Wagner, K. Futai and K. Suzuki [eds.], Protection of world forests from insect pests: advances in research. IUFRO World Series volume 11. IUFRO Secretariat, Vienna, Austria.
12. Clancy, K. M. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance in trees to defoliators, pp. 77-101. In M. R. Wagner, K. M. Clancy, F. Lieutier, and T. D. Paine [eds.], Mechanisms and deployment of resistance in trees to insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
13. Clancy, K. M., M. R. Wagner, and R. W. Tinus. 1988. Variation in host foliage nutrient concentrations in relation to western spruce budworm herbivory. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 530-539.
14. Clancy, K. M., J. K. Itami, and D. P. Huebner. 1993. Douglas-fir nutrients and terpenes: potential resistance factors to western spruce budworm defoliation. For. Sci. 39: 78-94.
15. Dodds, K. A., K. M. Clancy, K. J. Leyva, D. Greenberg, and P. W. Price. 1996. Effects of Douglas-fir foliage age class on western spruce budworm oviposition choice and larval performance. Great Basin Nat. 56: 135-141.
16. Grant, G. G., and D. Langevin. 1994. Oviposition responses for four Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) species to chemical and physical stimuli associated with host and nonhost foliage. Environ. Entomol. 23: 447-456.
17. Grant, G. G., and D. Langevin. 1995. Oviposition deterrence, stimulation, and effect on clutch size of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) species by extract fractious of host and nonhost foliage. Environ. Entomol. 24: 1656-1663.
18. Guertin, C., and P. J. Albert. 1992. Feeding preferences and feeding rates of two instars of spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in response to pure sucrose and sugar extracts of white spruce. For. Entomol. 85: 2317-2322.
19. Hartmann, H. T., and D. E. Kester (eds.). 1983. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. Prentice-Hall Englewood, Cliffs, NJ.
20. Hermann, R. K. 1987. Description of host species, pp. 43-56. In M. H. Brookes, R. W. Campbell, J. J. Colbert, R. G. Mitchell and R. W. Stark [eds.], Western spruce budworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Ser. Tech. Bull. 1694, Washington, D.C.
21. Leyva, K. J., K. M. Clancy, and P. W. Price. 1995. Performance of wild versus laboratory populations of western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) feeding on Douglas-fir foliage. Environ. Entomol. 24: 80-87.
22. Leyva, K. J., K. M. Claney, and P. W. Price. 2000. Oviposition preference and larval performance of the western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 29: 281-289.
23. Leyva, K. J., K. M. Clancy, and P. W. Price. 2003. Oviposition strategies employed by the western spruce budworm: tests of predictions from the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis. Agric. For. Entomol. 5: 9-16.
24. Mao, L., R. N. Story, A. M. Hammond, and D. R. Labonte. 2001. Effect of sweet potato genotype, storage time and production site ou feeding and oviposition behavior of the sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Apoinidae). Flor. Entomol. 84: 259-264.
25. Mattson, W. J., R. A. Haack, R. K. Lawrence, and S. S. Slocum. 1991. Considering the nutritional ecology of the spruce budworm in its management. For. Ecol. Mgmt. 39: 183-210.
26. McDonald, G. I. 1981. Differential defoliation of neighboring Douglas-fir trees by western spruce budworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Ser. Bes. Note INT-306, Ogden, UT.
27. Meng, F. R., and P. A. Arp. 1993. Net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of red spruce twigs before and after twig detachment. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 716-721.
28. Palermo, B. L. 2002. Western spruce budworm feeding and oviposition behavior and the implications for host plant resistance. M. S. thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
29. Price, P. W., N. Cobb, T. P. Craig, G. W. Fernandes, J. K. Itami, S. Mopper, and R. W. Prezler. 1990. Insect herbivore population dynamics on trees and shrubs: new approaches relevant to latent and eruptive species and life table analysis, pp. 1-38. In E. A. Bernays [ed.], Insect-plant interactions, vol. 2. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
30. Redak, R. A., and R. G. Cates. 1984. Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) - spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis) interactions: the effect of nutrition, chemical defenses tissue phenology, and tree physical parameters on budworm success. Oecologia (Berl.). 62: 61-67.
31. Renwick, J.A.A., and C. D. Radke. 1982. Ovipositional choice and larval survival of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 11: 503-505.
32. Shepherd, R. F. 1983. A technique to study phenologieal interactions between Douglas-fir buds and emerging second-instar western spruce budworm, pp. 17-20. In R. L. Talerico and M. Montgomery [eds.], Forest defoliator-host interactions: a comparison between gypsy moth and spruce budworms. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-85, Broomall, PA.
33. Stadler, E. 1974. Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition behavior of the eastern spruce budworm. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17: 176-188.
34. Wulf, N. W., and R. G. Cates. 1987. Site and stand characteristics, pp. 89-115. In M. H. Brookes, R. W. Campbell, J. J. Colbert, R. G. Mitchell, and R. W. Stark [eds.], Western spruce budworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Ser. Tech. Bull. 1694.
35. Zobel, B., and J. Talbert [eds.]. 1984. Applied forest tree improvement. Waveland Press, Inc. Prospect Heights, IL.