Exploring the WISC‐III as a measure of giftedness

Roeper Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 226-231

  Fishkin, Anne S ^a   Kampsnider, John J ^a   Pack, Lothell ^b  

^a MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b School psychologist   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038551369     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199609553744     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brown, S. W., & Yakimowski, M. E. (1987). Intelligence scores of gifted students on the WISC R. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 130-134.
2. Bryant, D. C. (1992). A comparison of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISCR) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WlSC-III)for gifted children. Unpublished master's thesis. West Virginia Graduate College, South Charleston.
3. Clark, B. (1991). Crowing up gifted. 4th ed., Columbus, OH: Merrill.
4. Fishkin, A. S., Garlow, D., & Kampsnider, J. J. (1994). Is the WISC-III gender equitable for the potentially gifted? Research Briefs, 9, 53-58.
5. Hollinger, C. L., & Kosek, S. (1986). Beyond the use of full scale IQ scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 74-77.
6. Hunsaker, S. L. (1994). Adjustments to traditional procedures for identifying underserved students: Successes and failures. Exceptional Child, 61, 72-76.
7. Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R, New York: Wiley.
8. Kaufman, A. S. (1992). Evaluation of the WISC-III and WPPSI-R for gifted children. Roeper Review, 14, 154-158.
9. Larrabee, G. J. & Holroyd, R. G. (1976). Comparison of WISC and WISC-R using a sample of highly intelligent children. Psychological Reports, 38, 1077-1080.
10. Lyon, M. A. (1995). A comparison between WISC-III and WISC-R scores for learning disabilities reevaluations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28 (4), 253-255.
11. Malone, P. S., Brounstein, P. J., von Brock, A., & Shaywitz, S.S. (1991). Components of IQ scores across levels of measured ability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 15-28.
12. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
13. Osborn, J. (1995, November). Identification: What interviews, instruments and why. Symposium on Highly Gifted presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Tampa, FL.
14. Patchett, R. F. & Stansfield, M. (1992). Subtest scatter on the WISC-R with children of superior intelligence. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 5-10.
15. Pratt, P. (1994). The effect of the WISC-III speed bonus points on high achievers tested for giftedness. Unpublished master's thesis. West Virginia Graduate College, South Charleston.
16. Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (1991). The reform movement and the quiet crisis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 26-35.
17. Robinson, N. M. (1992). Stanford-Binet IV, of course! Time marches on! Roeper Review, 15, 32-34.
18. Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.
19. Sevier, R. C., Bain, S. K., & Hildman, L. K. (1994). Comparison of WISC-R and WISC-III for gifted students. Roeper Review, 17, 39-42.
20. Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A. & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York, NY: Teachers College.
21. Silver, S. J., & Clampit, M. K. (1990). WISC-R profiles of high ability children: Interpretation of verbal-performance discrepancies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 76-79.
22. Silverman, L. K. & Kearney, K. (1992). The case for the Stanford-Binet L-M as a supplemental test. Roeper Review, 15, 34-37.
23. Swerdlik, M. E. (1977). The question of the comparability of the WISC and WISC-R: Review of the research and implications for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 14 (3), 269-270.
24. Terminie, T. J. & Waters, T. J. (1993, November). Utility of coding versus mazes in evaluating giftedness with the WISC-III. (Presentation at the First Annual South Padre Island, International Interdisciplinary Conference on the Cognitive Assessment of Children in School and Clinical Settings, Padre Island, TX).
25. Tuma, J. M, Appelbaum, A. S., & Bee, D. E. (1978). Comparability of the WISC and the WISC-R in normal children of divergent socioeconomic backgrounds. Psychology in the Schools, 15 (3), 339-346.
26. Vineyard, C. (1994). Gender bias examination of the WISC-III in students of superior intellect. Unpublished master's thesis, West Virginia Graduate College, South Charleston.
27. Webb, J. T. & Dyer, S. P. (1993, November). Unusual WISC-R patterns among gifted children. (Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Atlanta, GA).
28. Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.
29. Wilkinson, S. C. (1993). WISC-R profiles of children with superior intellectual ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 84-91.