MR arthrography: Pharmacology, efficacy and safety in clinical trials

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-12

  Schulte Altedorneburg, G ^a   Gebhard, M ^a   Wohlgemuth, W A ^a   Fischer, W ^a   Zentner, J ^a   Wegener, R ^a,b   Balzer, T ^a,b   Bohndorf, K ^a  

^a KLINIKUM AUGSBURG   (Germany)

^b BAYER PHARMA AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arthrography; Effectiveness; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pharmacology; Safety

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IOPROMIDE; IOTROLAN; LIDOCAINE; MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTHROSCOPY; ARTHROTOMY; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG ELIMINATION; DRUG MECHANISM; DRUG SAFETY; HUMAN; KNEE; META ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; ROTATOR CUFF RUPTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; SIDE EFFECT; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

ARTHROGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0038549111     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-002-0595-8     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, et al. MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 155:829-832.
2. Zanetti M, Hodler J. Contrast media in MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: intra-articular gadopentetate vs saline: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:498-502.
3. Tirman PF, Stauffer AE, Crues JV III, et al. Saline magnetic resonance arthrography in the evaluation of glenohumeral instability. Arthroscopy 1993; 9:550-559.
4. Willemsen UF, Wiedemann E, Brunner U, et al. Prospective evaluation of MR arthrography performed with high-volume intraarticular saline enhancement in patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:79-84.
5. Binkert CA, Zanetti M, Gerber C, Hodler J. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: two concentrations of gadoteridol versus Ringer solution as the intraarticular contrast material. Radiology 2001; 220:219-224.
6. Chandnani VP, Gagliardi JA, Murane TG, et al. Glenohumeral ligaments and shoulder capsular mechanisms: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1995; 196:27-32.
7. Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C, et al. Tendinopathy and rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1557-1561.
8. Bachmann G, Bauer T, Jürgensen I, et al. The diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic relevance of CT arthrography and MRI arthrography of the shoulder (in German). RoFo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Bildgeb Verf 1998; 108:149-56.
9. Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, DeBerardino T, et al. Glenoid labral tears: prospective evaluation with MR imaging, MR arthrography and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:1229-1235.
10. Tirman PFJ, Bost FW, Steinbach LS, et al. MR arthrographic depiction of tears of the rotator cuff: benefit of abduction and external rotation of the arm. Radiology 1994; 192:851-856.
11. Bradley YC, Chandnani VP, Gagliardi JA, et al. Partial thickness supraspinatus tears: diagnosis by magnetic resonance arthrography. Australas Radiol 1995; 39:124-127.
12. Jee WH, McCauley TR, Katz LD, et al. Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum: reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis. Radiology 2001; 218:127-132.
13. Pfirrman CWA, Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C, Hodler J. Subscapularis tendon tears: detection and grading at MR arthrography. Radiology 1999;213:709-714.
14. Kramer J, Recht MP, Imhof H, et al. Post-contrast MR arthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:218-223.
15. Applegate GR, Flannigan BD, Tolin BS, et al. MR diagnosis of recurrent tears in the knee: value of intraarticular contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:821-825.
16. Giovagnoni A, Valeri G, Ercolani P, et al. Magnetic resonance arthrography in chondral knee conditions. Radiol Med 1995; 90:219-225.
17. Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:629-636.
18. Kovanlikaya I, Camil D, Cakmakci H, et al. Diagnostic value of MR arthrography in detection of intrinsic carpal ligament lesions: use of cine-MR arthrography as a new approach. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:1441-1445.
19. Schweitzer ME, Brahme SK, Hodler J, et al. Chronic wrist pain: SE and Short Tau IR MRI and conventional and MR arthrography Radiology 1992; 182:205-211.
20. Scheck RJ, Kubitzek C, Hierner R, et al. The scapholunate interosseous ligament in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with non-enhanced MRI and wrist arthroscopy. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26:263-271.
21. Chandnani VP, Harper MT, Ficke JR, et al. Chronic ankle instability: evaluation with MR arthrography, MR imaging, and stress radiography. Radiology 1994; 192:189-194.
22. Robinson P, White LM, Salonen DC, Daniels TR, Ogilvie-Harris D. Anterolateral ankle impingement: MR arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral recess. Radiology 2001; 221:186-190.
23. Czerny C, Kramer J, Neuhold A, et al. Magnetresonanztomographie und Magnetresonanzarthrographie des Labrum acetabulare: Vergleich mit operativen Ergebnissen. RoFo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Bildgeb Verf 2001; 173:702-707
24. Palmer WE, Caslowitz PL. Anterior shoulder instability: diagnostic criteria determined from prospective analysis of 121 MR arthrograms. Radiology 1995; 197:819-825.
25. Cvitanic O, Tirman PFJ, Feller JF, et al. Using abduction and external rotation of the shoulder to increase the sensitivity of MR arthrography in revealing tears of the anterior glenoid labrum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:837-844.
26. Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, et al. Superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions: diagnosis with MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 2000; 214:267-271.
27. Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1994; 190:645-651.
28. Sanders TG, Tirman PF, Linares R, et al. The glenolabral articular disruption lesion: MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:171-175.
29. Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology 1992; 182:431-436.
30. Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat suppressed MR arthrography. Radiology 1993; 188:683-687.
31. Lill H, Lange K, Reinbold WD, et al. MRT arthrography. Improved diagnostic procedure in shoulder instability (in German). Unfallchirurgie 1997;100:186-190.
32. Löw R, Kreitner KF, Runkel M, et al. Low-field MR arthrography of the shoulder: early results using an open 0.2 T MR system (in German). RoFo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Bildgeb Verf 1998; 168:316-322.
33. Roger B, Skaf A, Hooper AW, Lektrakul N, Yeh L, Resnick D. Imaging findings in the dominant shoulder of throwing athletes: comparison of radiography, arthrography, CT arthrography, and MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1371-1380.
34. Kreitner KF, Gerbe P, Kersjes W, et al. MR arthrography of the shoulder: possible indications for clinical use (in German). RoFo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Bildgeb Verf 1994; 160:137-142.
35. Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Flannigan B, et al. Injuries of the superior portion of the glenoid labrum involving the insertion of the biceps tendon: MR findings in 9 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:565-568.
36. Tirman PFJ, Bost FW, Garvin GJ, et al. Posteriosuperior glenoid impingement of the shoulder: findings at MR imaging and MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation. Radiology 1994; 193:431-436.
37. Hottya GA, Tirman PF, Bost FW, et al. Tear of the posterior shoulder stabilizers after posterior dislocation: MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings with arthroscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:763-768.
38. Engel A, Kramer J, Nehrer S. Proton spin tomography in meniscus diagnosis (in German). Orthopaede 1994; 23:112-116.
39. Engel A, Kramer J, Stiglbauer R, et al. Articular cartilage defect detectability in human knees with MR-arthrography. Eur Radiol 1993; 3:161-165.
40. Kramer J, Stiglbauer R, Engel A, et al. MR Contrast arthrography (MRA) in osteochondritis dissecans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:254-260.
41. Sciulli RL, Boutin RD, Brown RR, et al. Evaluation of the postoperative meniscus of the knee: a study comparing conventional arthrography, conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography with iodinated contrast material and MR arthrography with gadolinium-based contrast material. Skeletal Radiol 1999; 28:508-514.
42. Scheck RJ, Romagnolo A, Hierner R, et al. The carpal ligaments in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with standard MRI and wrist arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:468-474.
43. Zanetti M, Bräm J, Hodler J. Triangular fibrocartilage and intercarpal ligaments of the wrist: does MR arthrography improve standard MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:590-594.
44. Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A, et al. Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology 1996; 200:225-230.
45. Petersilge CA, Haque MA, Petersilge WJ, et al. Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1996; 200:231-235.
46. Harper MT, Chandnani VP, Spaeth J, et al. Gamekeeper's thumb: diagnosis of ulnar collateral ligament injury using magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and stress radiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:322-328.
47. Kopka L, Funke M, Fischer U, et al. MR arthrography of the shoulder with gadopentetate dimeglumine: influence of concentration, iodinated contrast material and time on signal intensity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:621-623.
48. Petersilge CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Hatem SF. MR arthrography of the shoulder: rethinking traditional imaging procedures to meet the technical requirements of MR imaging guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1453-1457.
49. Funke M, Kopka L, Vosshenrich J, et al. MR arthrography in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Acta Radiol 1996; 37:627-632.
50. Kopka L, Funke M, Fischer U, et al. Signal characteristics of x-ray contrast media and their interaction with Gd-DTPA in MRT (in German). RoFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1994; 160:349-352.
51. Rand T, Trattnig S, Breitenseher M, et al. Postoperative MR arthrography of the shoulder joint (in German). Radiologe 1996; 36:966-970.
52. Mayer DP, Schoenhaus H, Jay RM, et al. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the ankle. J Foot Surg 1992; 31:584-607.
53. Beaulieu CF, Ladd AL. MR arthrography of the wrist: scanning-room injection of the radiocarpal joint based on clinical landmarks. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:606-608.
54. Dr Robert Heinz & Partner GmbH. Studie Magnevist 02. Klinische Prüfung der Phase III von Magnevist (Gadolinium-DTPA) zur Darstellung von kontrastierten Gelenken in der Kernspintomographie. 1995.
55. Dr Robert Heinz & Partner GmbH. Studie Magnevist 02. Ergebnisse einer offenen, unkontrollierten, multizentrischen klinischen Prüfung der Phase III mit Magnevist 2 mmol/l (Gadolinium-DTPA) zur Darstellung von kontrastierten Gelenken in der Kernspintomographie. 1996.
56. Robbins MI, Anzilotti Jr KF, Katz LD, Lange RC. Patient perception of magnetic resonance arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29: 265-269.
57. Binkert CA, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Patient's assessment of discomfort during MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 2001; 221:775-778.
58. Rinck PA, Muller RN. Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:998-1004.
59. Rinck PA, Fischer HW, van der Elst L, et al. Field-cycling relaxometry: medical applications. Radiology 1988; 168:843-849.
60. Hajek PC, Sartoris DJ, Neumann CH, et al. Potential contrast agents for MR arthrography: in vitro evaluation and practical observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149:97-104.
61. Speck U. Special characteristics of the contrast media for magnetic resonance imaging. In: Speck U. Contrast media. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1999:84-87.
62. Turnheim K. Wasser und Elektrolyte. Therapie von Störungen des Wasserund Elektrolythaushaltes sowie des Säure-Basen-Gleichgewichtes. In: Forth W, Henschler D, Rummel W, Starke K, eds. Allgemeine und spezielle Pharmakologie, 6th edn. Mannheim: BI Wissenschaftsverlag, 1992:410-415.
63. Drape JL, Thelen P, Gay-Dapassier P, et al. Intra-articular diffusion of Gd-DOTA after i.v. injection in the knee: MRI evaluation. Radiology 1993; 188:227-234.
64. Yamoto M, Tamai K, Yamaguchi T, et al. MRI of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis: Gd-DTPA perfusion dynamics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:781-785.
65. Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Riccio T, Weisman HM, et al. Rheumatoid knee: role of gadopentetate-enhanced MR-imaging. Radiology 1990; 176:831-835.
66. Engel A, Hajek P, Kramet J, et al. Magnetic resonance knee arthrography: enhanced contrast by gadolinium complex in the rabbit and in humans. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1990; 240:1-57.
67. Reiser M, Peters PE, Bongartz G, et al. MR-Arthrographie des Kniegelenkes nach intraartikulärer Gd-DTPA-Injektion. In: Lissner J, Doppman JL, eds. MR '89: 3. Int. Kernspintomographie Symposium Garmisch-Partenkirchen, January 1989. Cologne: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, 1990:16-21.
68. Jevtic V, Beravs K, Praprotnik T. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MR arthrography) of the shoulder joint: signal intensity changes of 2 mmol/l Gd-DTPA solution after 2, 6 and 24 hours. Sixth Scientific Meeting of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Edinburgh, 6-9 October 1999, Abstract book, p 8.
69. Weinmann HJ. Eigenschaften von Gd-DTPA-Dimeglumin. In: Felix R, Heshiki A, Hosten N, Hricak H, eds. Monographie Magnevist. Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschaft, 1999:15.
70. Engel A, Hamilton G, Hajek P, Fleischmann D. In vitro uptake of 153-gadolinium and gadolinium complexes by hyaline articular cartilage. Eur J Radiol 1990; 11:104-106.
71. Brown RR, Clarke DW, Daffner RH. Is a mixture of gadolinium and iodinated contrast material safe during MR arthrography? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1087-1090.
72. Rössler H, Rüther W. In: Rössler H, Rüther W. Orthopädie. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1997:28-29.
73. Newberg AH, Munn CS, Robbins AH. Complications of arthrography. Radiology 1985; 155:605-606.
74. Dick W, Glinz W, Henche HR, Ruckstuhl J, Wruhs O, Zollinger H. Complications of arthroscopy. A review of 3,714 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1978; 92:69-73.
75. Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Deliz ED. Complications of shoulder arthroscopy. Orthop Rev 1991; 20:743-751.
76. Niendorf HP, Alhassan A, Balzer T, Clauss W, Geens V. Sicherheit und Risiken von Gd-DTPA: klinische Erfahrungen nach über 20,000,000 Anwendungen. In: Felix R, et al. eds. Magnevist. Eine Monographie. Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschaft, 1999.
77. Kubik-Huch RA, Gottstein-Aalame NM, Frenzel T, et al. Gadopentetate dimeglumine excretion into human breast milk during lactation. Radiology 2000; 216:555-558.