|
Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 117-120
|
Did the neurosurgeon warn the patient of the risks?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DECISION MAKING;
GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL RECORD;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
NEGLIGENCE;
NERVE INJURY;
NEUROLOGIC DISEASE;
NEUROSURGERY;
PATIENT INFORMATION;
PATIENT RIGHT;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SURGEON;
SURGICAL PATIENT;
SURGICAL RISK;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WITNESS;
DUTY TO WARN;
HUMANS;
MALPRACTICE;
NEUROSURGERY;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
TRUTH DISCLOSURE;
|
EID: 0038548598
PISSN: 02688697
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/0268869031000108856 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|