Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the forward problem of electroencephalography

Electromagnetics

Volumn 21, Issue 7-8, 2001, Pages 513-530

  Finke, Stefan ^a   Gulrajani, Ramesh M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electrocardiography; Electroencephalography; Forward problem; Reciprocity; Weighted residuals

Indexed keywords

CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; DISCRETIZATIONS; FIELD EQUATION; FORWARD PROBLEM; HEAD MODEL; RECIPROCITY; SCALAR PRODUCT; SKULL CONDUCTIVITY; SOURCE CURRENTS; SURFACE ELECTRODE; VERTEX METHOD; WEIGHTED RESIDUALS;

ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE POTENTIAL;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

EID: 0038545030     PISSN: 02726343     EISSN: 1532527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/027263401752246171     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fletcher, D. J., A. Amir, D. L. Jewett, and G. Fein. 1995. Improved method for computation of potentials in a realistic head shape model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42:1094-1104.
2. Brebbia, C. A., and J. Dominguez. 1992. Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course, 2nd ed., Chap. 2. Southampton, U.K.: WIT Press.
3. Plonsey, R. 1969. Bioelectric Phenomena, Chap. 5. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Gulrajani, R. M. 1998. Bioelectricity and Biomagnetism, Chap. 5. New York: Wiley.
5. van Oosterom, A., and J. Strackee. 1983. The solid angle of a plane triangle. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 30:125-126.
6. de Munck, J. C. 1992. A linear discretization of the volume conductor boundary integral equation using analytically integrated elements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:986-990.
7. Meijs, J. W. H., O. W. Weier, M. J. Peters, and A. van Oosterom. 1989. On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:1038-1049.
8. Heller, L. 1990. Computation of the return current in encephalography: The auto solid angle. In Digital Image Synthesis and Inverse Optics, SPIE Vol. 1351, pp. 376-390.
9. Wischmann, H.-A., R. Drenckhahn, M. Wagner, and M. Fuchs. 1996. Systematic distribution of the auto solid angle and related integrals onto the adjacent triangles for the node based boundary element method. Med. Biol. Eng. & Comput. 34, Suppl. 1, Part 2:245-246.
10. Barnard, A. C. L., I. M. Duck, M. S. Lynn, and W. P. Timlake. 1967. The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology. II. Numerical solution of the integral equations. Biophys. J. 7:463-491.
11. Lynn, M. S., and W. P. Timlake. 1968. The use of multiple deflations in the numerical solution of singular systems of equations, with applications to potential theory. SIAM J. N umer. Anal. 5:303-322.
12. Rush, S., and D. A. Driscoll. 1968. Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes. Anesthesia Analgesia 47:717-723.
13. Hamalainen, M. S., and J. Sarvas. 1989. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:165-171.
14. Oostendorp, T. F., J. Delbeke, and D. F. Stegeman. 2000. The conductivity of the human skull: Results of in vivo and in vitro measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47:1487-1492.
15. Ary, J. P., S. A. Klein, and D. H. Fender. 1981. Location of sources of evoked scalp potentials: Corrections for skull and scalp thickness. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 28:447-452.
16. Schlitt, H. A., L. Heller, R. Aaron, E. Best, and D. M. Ranken. 1995. Evaluation of boundary element methods for the EEG forward problem: Effect of linear interpolation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42:52-58.
17. Ferguson, A. S., and G. Stroink. 1997. Factors a ecting the accuracy of the boundary element method in the forward problem-I. Calculating surface potentials. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44:1139-1155.
18. Mosher, J. C., R. M. Leahy, and P. S. Lewis. 1999. EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:245-259.
19. Pullan, A. 1996. A high-order coupled ®nite element/boundary element torso model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43:292-298.
20. Fischer, G., B. Tilg, P. Wach, R. Modre, U. Leder, and H. Nowak. 1999. Application of high-order boundary elements to the electrocardiographic inverse problem. Comp. Methods Prog. Biomed. 58:119-131.
21. Gencer, N. G., and I. O. Tanzer. 1999. Forward problem solution of electromagnetic source imaging using a new BEM formulation with high-order elements. Phys. Med. Biol. 44:2275-2287.
22. Frijns, J. H. M., S. L. de Snoo, and R. Schoonhoven. 2000. Improving the accuracy of the boundary element method by the use of second-order interpolation functions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47:1336-1346.
23. Riera, J. J., and M. E. Fuentes. 1998. Electric lead ®eld for a piecewise homogeneous volume conductor model of the head. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45:746-753.
24. Laarne, P., J. Hyttinen, S. Dodel, J. Malmivuo, and H. Eskola. 2000. Accuracy of two dipolar inverse algorithms applying reciprocity for forward calculation. Comp. Biomed. Res. 33:172-185.
25. Weinstein, D., L. Zhukov, and C. Johnson. 2000. Lead-field bases for electroencepha-lography source imaging. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28:1059-1065.
26. Vanrumste, B., G. Van Hoey, R. Van de Walle, M. D'Have, I. Lemahiev, and P. Boon. 2000. Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38:528-534.