Prelexical spatial representations

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 229-256

  Mapelli, Daniela ^a   Umiltà, Carlo ^b   Nicoletti, Roberto ^c,d   Fanini, Alessandra ^b   Capezzani, Liuva ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF URBINO   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038543097     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026432996382015     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bisiach, E.., & Vallar, G. (1988). Hemineglect in humans. In F. Boiler & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A.E. (1990a). Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature, 346, 267-269.
3. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A.E. (1990b). Levels of representation, coordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 391-445.
4. Coltheart, M. (1981). Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. Visible Language. 15, 245-268.
5. Egeth, H.E., & Santee, J.L. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 506-517.
6. Ellis, A.W., Flude, B.M., & Young, A.W. (1987). "Neglect dyslexia" and the early visual processing of letters in words and nonwords. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 439-464.
7. Hommel, B., & Lippa, Y. (in press). S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
8. Humphreys, G.W., Besner, D., & Quinlan, P.T. (1988). Event perception and the word repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 51-67.
9. Humphreys, G.W., & Evett, L.J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioural and Brain Science, 8, 689-740.
10. Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., & Quinlan, P.T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
11. Humphreys, G.W., & Riddoch, M.J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 283-311.
12. Jeannerod, M. (Ed.) (1987). Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Kanwisher, N.G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
14. Kinsbourne, M. (1987), Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis of stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Review. 97, 253-270.
16. Logan, G.D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174.
17. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R.W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2, 174-207.
18. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M.T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
19. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
20. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H.K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organisation of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, 200, 269-294.
21. McLeod, P. (1977). Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica. 41, 381-391.
22. Mozer, M.C. (1989). Types and tokens in visual letter preception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 287-303.
23. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 164-169.
24. Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., & Mapelli, D. (1992). The spatial representation of words and non words. Cortex. 28, 163-174.
25. O'Leary, M.J., & Barber, P.J. (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 830-844.
26. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J.C. (1989). Interference between temporally overlapping tasks: Chronometic evidence for central postponement with or without response grouping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
27. Pugh, K.R., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 807-825.
28. Rapp, B.C., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Spatially determined deficits in letter and word processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 275-311.
29. Riddoch, M.J. (1990). Neglect and the peripheral dyslexias. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 7, 369-389.
30. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G., Cleton, P., & Fery, P. (1990). Interaction of attentional and lexical processes in neglect dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 7, 479-517.
31. Robertson, I.H., & Marshall, J.C. (Eds.) (1993). Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
32. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Simon, J.R., Mewaldt, S.P., Acosta, E., & Hu, J.-M. (1976). Processing auditory information: Interaction of two population stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 354-358.
34. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M.I. Posner & O.S.M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
35. Urmiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R.W. Proctor & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
37. Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (in press). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research.