Anorectal function following low anterior resection

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 258-261

  Rasmussen, Ole O ^a   Petersen, I K ^a   Christiansen, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anorectal function; Anorectal physiology; Rectal cancer; Rectal resection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANOPLASTY; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS CONTINENCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON SURGERY; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DATA ANALYSIS; FECES ANALYSIS; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FLATULENCE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; MALE; MANOMETRY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RECTUM ANASTOMOSIS; RECTUM CARCINOMA; RECTUM RESECTION; REFLEX; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CONSTIPATION; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0038530849     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00439.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Pedersen IK, Christiansen J. A study of the physiological variation in anal manometry. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 69-71.
2. Rasmussen OO, Rønholt C, Alstrup N, Christiansen J. Anorectal pressure gradient and rectal compliance in fecal incontinence. Int J Colorect Dis 1998; 13: 157-9.
3. Sørensen M, Tetzschner T, Rasmussen OO, Christiansen J. Viscous fluid retention. a new method of evaluating anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 357-61.
4. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991; 338: 1166-9.
5. McAnena OJ, Heald RJ, Lockhart-Mummery HE. Operative and functional results of total mesorectal excision with ultra-low anterior resection in the management of carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170: 517-21.
6. Williamson MER, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 411-8.
7. Graf W, Ekstrøm K, Glimelius B, Påhlman L. A pilot study of factors influencing bowel function after colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 744-9.
8. Pedersen IK, Christiansen J, Hint Y, Jensen P, Olsen J, Mortensen PE. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986; 204: 133-5.
9. Hallbook O, Pahlmann L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjodahl R. Randomised comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 58-65.
10. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W. Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection. impact of level of anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997; 12: 82-7.
11. Ikeuchi H, Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yamamura T, Utsonomiya J. Clinico-physiological results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996; 11: 172-6.