Contact stresses in the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 217, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 49-57

  Swieszkowski W ^a   Bednarz, P ^b   Prendergast, P J ^c,d  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Conformity; Contact stresses; Glenoid component; Metal backing

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CALCULATIONS; COBALT ALLOYS; ELASTIC MODULI; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PLASTIC DEFORMATION; STRESS ANALYSIS; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES; WEAR OF MATERIALS; YIELD STRESS; ARTHROPLASTY; ORTHOPEDICS; POLYETHYLENES;

CONTACT STRESS; GLENOID COMPONENT; HUMERUS ABDUCTION ANGLE; METAL BACKING; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY;

JOINT PROSTHESES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE; ULTRA-HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE; VITALLIUM;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; VALIDATION STUDY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYETHYLENES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER JOINT; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VITALLIUM;

CONFORMITY; CONTACT STRESS; ELASTICITY THEORY; GLENOID COMPONENT; METAL BACKINGS; POLYETHYLENE WEAR; SURFACE IRREGULARITIES; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY;

EID: 0038530703     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/095441103762597737     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anglin, C., Wyss, U. P. and Pichora, D. R. Glenohumeral contact forces. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2000, 214(H6), 637-644.
2. Rockwood, C. A. and Matsen, F. A. III (Eds). The Shoulder, 1998 (WB Saunders, Philadelphia).
3. Wirth, M. A. and Rockwood, C. A. Jr Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1994, 307, 47-69.
4. Antuna, S. A., Sperling, J. W., Cofield, R. H. and Rowland, C. M. Glenoid revision surgery after total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 2001, 10 (3), 217-224.
5. Klimkiewicz, J. J., Iannotti, J. P., Rubash, H. E. and Shanbhag, A. S. Aseptic loosening of the humeral component in total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 1998, 7 (4), 422-426.
6. Wirth, M. A., Agrawal, C. M., Mabrey, J. D., Dean, D. D., Blanchard, C. R., Miller, M. A. and Rockwood, C. A. Jr Isolation and characterization of polyethylene wear debris associated with osteolysis following total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg. (Am.), 1999, 81 (1), 29-37.
7. Bartel, D. L., Bicknell, V. L. and Wright, T. M. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J. Bone Jt Surg. (Am.), 1986, 68 (7), 1041-1051.
8. Scarlat, M. M. and Matsen, F. A. III Observations on retrieved polyethylene glenoid components. J. Arthroplasty, 2001, 16 (6), 795-801.
9. Gillis, A. and Li, S. Polyethylene damage of glenoid components from total shoulder replacements as determined from retrieval analysis. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California, 25-28 February 2001, p. 0775.
10. Gunther, S. B., Graham, J., Norris, T. R., Ries, M. D. and Pruitt, L. Retrieved glenoid components: a classification system for surface damage analysis. J. Arthroplasty, 2002, 17 (1), 95-100.
11. Bartel, D. L., Burstein, A. H., Toda, M. D. and Edwards, D. L. The effect of conformity and plastic thickness on contact stresses in metal-backed plastic implants. J. Biomech. Engng, 1985, 107(3), 193-199.
12. McGloughin, T. M. and Kavanagh, A. G. Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total knee prostheses: a review of key influences. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2000, 214(H4), 349-359.
13. Rostoker, W. and Galante, J. O. Contact pressure dependence of wear rates of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1979, 13(6), 957-964.
14. Lewis, G. Polyethylene wear in total hip and knee arthroplasties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1997, 38 (1), 55-75.
15. Anglin, C., Wyss, U. P., Nyffeler, R. W. and Gerber, C. Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs. Clin. Biomechanics, 2001, 16 (2), 144-150.
16. Karduna, A. R., Williams, G. R., Iannotti, J. P., and Williams, J. L. Total shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics: a study of the forces and strains at the glenoid component. J. Biomech. Engng, 1998, 120 (1), 92-99.
17. Li, G., Sakamoto, M. and Chao, E. Y. A comparison of different methods in predicting static pressure distribution in articulating joints. J. Biomechanics, 1997, 30 (6), 635-638.
18. Jin, Z. M., Dowson, D. and Fisher, J. A parametric analysis of the contact stress in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups. Med. Engng Physics, 1994, 16(5), 398-405.
19. Unsworth, A. and Strozzi, A. Axisymmetric finite element analysis of hip replacements possessing an elastomeric layer: the effects of clearance and Poisson's ratio. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1995, 209(1), 59-64.
20. Wang, A., Essner, A. and Klein, R. Effect of contact stress on friction and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total hip replacement. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2001, 215(H2), 133-139.
21. Couteau, B., Mansat, P., Estivalezes, E., Darmana, R., Mansat, M. and Egan, J. Finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of a scapula implanted with a glenoid prosthesis. Clin. Biomechanics, 2001, 16 (7), 566-575.
22. Poppen, N. K. and Walker, P. S. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin. Orthop., 1978, 135, 165-170.
23. Van der Helm, F. C. T. Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism. J. Biomechanics, 1994; 27 (5), 527-550.
24. Wright, T. M., Bartel, D. L. and Rimnac, C. M. Surface damage in polyethylene joint components. In Proceedings of IMechE International Conference on The Changing Role of Engineering in Orthopaedics., 14-15 April 1989 (Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Birdcage Walk, London), pp. 187-192.
25. McCullagh, P. J. Biomechanics and design of shoulder arthroplasty. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1995, 209(H4), 207-213.
26. Skirving, A. P. Total shoulder arthroplasty-current problems and possible solutions. J. Orthop. Sci., 1999, 4 (1), 42-53.
27. Sperling, J. W., Cofield, R. H., O'Driscoll, S. W., Torchia, M. E. and Rowland, C. M. Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 2000, 9(6), 507-513.
28. McNamura, J. L., Collier, J. P., Mayor, M. B., and Jensen, R. E. A comparison of contact pressures in tibial and patellar total knee components before and after service in vivo. Clin. Orthop., 1994, February (299), 104-113.
29. Lee, K.-Y. and Pienkowski, D. Compressive creep characteristics of extruded ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998, 39, 261-256.
30. Sathasivam, S. and Walker, P. S. Optimization of the bearing surface geometry of total knees. J. Biomechanics, 1994, 27(3), 255-264.