Influence of adsorption and concentration polarisation on membrane performance during ultrafiltration of a non-ionic surfactant

Desalination

Volumn 151, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 21-31

  Byhlin, H ^a   Jonsson A S ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Flux; Hydrophilic and hydrophobic membranes; Non ionic surfactant; Retention; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; MEMBRANES; MONOMERS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION;

DESALINATION;

ADSORPTION; MEMBRANE; POLARIZATION; SURFACTANT; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0038527104     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00969-4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. J.F. Scamehorn, R.T. Ellington, S.D. Christian, B.W. Penney, R.O. Dunn and S.N. Bhat, Removal of multivalent metal cations from water using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration, AIChE Symp. Ser., 82(250) (1986) 48-58.
2. K. Kandori and R.S. Schechter, Selection of surfactants for micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration, Sep. Sci. Tech., 25(1,2) (1990) 83-108.
3. P. Tounissou, M. Hebrant, L. Rodehuser and C. Tondre, Ultrafiltration of micellar solutions in the presence of electrolytes, J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 183 (1996) 484-490.
4. R. Singh, Removal of volatile organic compounds by ultrafiltration, Desalination, 104 (1996) 203-214.
5. R.O. Dunn, Jr., J.F. Scamehorn and S.D. Christian, Use of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration to remove dissolved organics from aqueous streams, Sep. Sci. Tech., 20(4) (1985) 257-284.
6. G. Morel, A. Gracia and J. Lachaise, Enhanced nitrate ultrafiltration by cationic surfactant, J. Membr. Sci., 56 (1991) 1-12.
7. M. Ismael and C. Tondre, Extraction and back-extraction of metal ions in micellar systems using ultrafiltration: thermodynamic and kinetic aspects, J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 160 (1993) 252-257.
8. F. Charbit, A. Steinchen, Z. Sadaoui and G. Charbit, Ultrafiltration of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide solutions, J. Membr. Sci., 133 (1997) 1-13.
9. S. Akita, L. Yang and H. Takeuchi, Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of gold(III) with non-ionic surfactant, J. Membr. Sci., 133 (1997) 189-194.
10. C.K. Kim, S.S. Kim, D.W. Kim, J.C. Lim and J.J. Kim, Removal of aromatic compounds in the aqueous solution via micellar enhanced ultrafiltration: Part 1: Behaviour of non-ionic surfactants, J. Membr. Sci., 147 (1998) 13-22.
11. S. Akita, L.P. Castillo, S. Nii, K. Takahashi and H. Takeuchi, Separation of Co(II)/Ni(II) via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using organophosphorus acid extractant solubilized by non-ionic surfactant, J. Membr. Sci., 162 (1999) 111-117.
12. S.M. Mahdi and R.O. Sköld, Surface chemistry aspects on the use of ultrafiltration for the recycling of waterbased synthetic metal working fluids: component studies, J. Disp. Sci. Techn., 11(1) (1990) 1-30.
13. S.M. Mahdi and R.O. Sköld, Membrane filtration for the recycling of water-based synthetic metal-working fluids, Filtr. Sep., Nov./Dec. (1991) 407-414.
14. T.C. Lindsey, A.G. Ocker and G.D. Miller, Recovery of an aqueous iron phosphating degreasing bath by ultrafiltration, Air Waste, 44(5) (1994) 697-701.
15. M. Belkacem, H. Matamoros, C. Cabassud, Y. Aurelle and J. Cotteret, New results in metal working waste-water treatment using membrane technology, J. Membr. Sci., 106 (1995) 195-205.
16. A.-S. Jönsson and J. Wennerbeck, Treatment of a high-temperature rinsing water from a degreasing plant by reverse osmosis, Desalination, 114 (1997) 175-181.
17. A.S.C. Chen, N. Stencel and D. Ferguson, Using ceramic membranes to recycle two non-ionic alkaline metal-cleaning solutions, J. Membr. Sci., 162 (1999) 219-234.
18. N. Rajagopalan, T. Lindsey and J. Sparks, Recycling of aqueous cleaning solutions with membrane filtration: issues and practice, Met. Finish., 97(3) (1999) 39-51.
19. C.C. Ang and A.S. Abdul, Evaluation of an ultra-filtration method for surfactant recovery and reuse during in situ washing of contaminated sites: laboratory and field studies, Ground Water Monitoring Review, 14(3) (1994) 160-171.
20. C. Jönsson and A.-S. Jönsson, The influence of degreasing agents used at car washes on the performance of ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination, 100 (1995) 115-123.
21. G. Trägårdh and D. Johansson, Purification of alkaline cleaning solutions from the dairy industry using membrane separation technology, Desalination, 119 (1998) 21-29.
22. A.-S. Jönsson and B. Jönsson, The influence of non-ionic and ionic surfactants on hydrophobic and hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 56 (1991) 49-76.
23. S.M. Mahdi and R.O. Sköld, Reconcentration of a polydisperse non-ionic surfactant in aqueous solution by adsorption induced ultrafiltration, Coll. Surf., 68 (1992) 111-120.
24. M.R. Böhmer and L.K. Koopal, Adsorption of ionic surfactants on variable-charge surfaces. 1. Charge effects and structure of adsorbed layer, Langmuir, 8 (1992) 2649-2659.
25. O. Surel and M.-H. Famelart, Microfiltration of long chain carboxylates: relationship between rejection and micellization, Desalination, 95 (1994) 11-25.
26. R. Field, S. Hang and T. Arnot, The influence of surfactant on water flux through microfiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 86 (1994) 291-304.
27. D. Doulia, G. Trägårdh and V. Gekas, Interaction behaviour in ultrafiltration of non-ionic surfactants. Part II: Static adsorption below CMC, J. Membr. Sci., 123 (1997) 133-142.
28. M. Lindheimer, E. Keh, S. Zaini and S. Partyka, Interfacial aggregation of non-ionic surfactants onto silica gel: calorimetric evidence, J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 138(1) (1990) 83-91.
29. V.L. Alekseev, G. A. Evmenenko and A.T. Dembo, Osmotic pressure and structure of aqueous solutions of Triton X-100, Colloid J., 59(3) (1997) 267-272.
30. D. Doulia, V. Gekas and G. Trägårdh, Interaction behaviour in ultrafiltration of non-ionic surfactants. Part 1: Flux behaviour, J. Membr. Sci., 69 (1992) 251-258.
31. V. Chen, A.G. Fane and C.J.D. Fell, The use of anionic surfactants for reducing fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: their effects and optimization, J. Membr. Sci., 67 (1992) 249-261.
32. G. Akay and R.J. Wakeman, Mechanisms of permeate flux decay, solute rejection and concentration polarisation in crossflow filtration of a double chain ionic surfactant dispersion, J. Membr. Sci., 88 (1994) 177-195.
33. S. Welin-Klinström, A. Askendal and H. Elwing, Surfactant and protein interactions on wettability gradient surfaces, J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 158 (1993) 188-194.
34. A.-S. Jönsson, J. Lindau, R. Wimmerstedt, J. Brinck and B. Jönsson, Influence of the concentration of a low-molecular organic solute on the flux reduction of a polyethersulphone ultrafiltration membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 135 (1997) 117-128.
35. A.-S. Jönsson and B. Jönsson, Influence of the membrane material on the adsorptive fouling of ultrafiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 108 (1995) 79-87.
36. J. Lindau, A.-S. Jönsson and A. Bottino, Flux reduction of ultrafiltration membranes with different cut-off due to adsorption of a low-molecular-weight hydrophobic solute-correlation between flux decline and pore size, J. Membr. Sci., 149 (1998) 11-20.
37. J. Brinck, A.-S. Jönsson, B. Jönsson and J. Lindau, Influence of pH on the adsorptive fouling of ultrafiltration membranes by fatty acid, J. Membr. Sci., 164 (2000) 187-194.
38. M. Mietton-Peuchot, O. Ranisio and C. Peuchot, Study of behaviour of membranes in the presence of anionic or non-ionic surfactants, Filtr. Sep., Oct. (1997) 883-886.