Laser fluorescence detection of occlusal caries

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 268-273

  Tonioli, Matthew B ^a,b   Bouschlicher, Murray R ^a   Hillis, Stephen L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c VA Iowa City Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; FLUORESCENCE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LASER; MICROSCOPY; MOLAR TOOTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMICONDUCTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER CURVE; COLORING AGENTS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES ACTIVITY TESTS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; LASERS; MICROSCOPY; MOLAR; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMICONDUCTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0038521347     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Stamm JW. Is there a need for dental sealants? Epidemiological indications in the 1980's. J Dent Educ 1984 (Sp Is); 48:9-17.
2. Konig KG. Impact of decreasing caries prevalence: Implications for dental research. J Dent Res 1982; 61 (Sp. Is): 1378-1383.
3. Ripa LW, Leske GS, Varma AO. Longitudinal study of the caries susceptibility of occlusal and proximal surfaces of first permanent molars. J Public Health Dent 1988; 48: 8-13.
4. Dummer PMH, Oliver SJ, Hicks R, et al. Factors influencing the initiation of carious lesions in specific tooth surfaces over a 4-year period in children between the ages of 11-12 years and 15-16 years. J Dent 1990; 18: 190-197.
5. Truin GJ, van't Hof MA, Kalsbeek H, et al. Secular trends of caries prevalence in 6-and 12 year-old Dutch children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 249-252.
6. Ricketts DNJ, Kidd EAM. Hidden caries. What is it? Does it exist? Does it matter? Int Dent J 1997; 47: 259-265.
7. Kidd EA, Ricketts DNJ, Pitts NB. Occlusal caries diagnosis: A changing challenge for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Dent 1993; 21: 323-331.
8. Lussi A. Validity of diagnostic and treatment decisions of fissure caries. Caries Res 1991; 25: 296-303.
9. Lussi A. Comparison of different methods for the diagnosis of fissure caries without cavitation. Caries Res 1993; 27: 409-416.
10. Lussi A. Impact of including or excluding cavitated lesions when evaluating methods for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 1996; 30: 389-393.
11. Ricketts DNJ, Kidd EAM, Smith BGN, et al. Clinical and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries: A study in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:15-20.
12. Sawle RF, Andlaw RJ. Has occlusal caries become more difficult to diagnose. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 209-211.
13. Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE, Eggink CO. The clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries: A problem. ASDC J Dent Child 1989; 56: 196-200.
14. Bader JD, Brown JP. Dilemmas in caries diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 12: 48-50.
15. Allan CD, Naylor MN. Radiographs in the identification of occlusal caries. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 504.
16. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ, Bast AJJ, et al. Clinically undetected occlusal dental caries: A radiographic comparison. Caries Res 1992; 26: 305-309.
17. Van Dorp CSE, Exterkate RAM, ten Cate JM. The effect of dental probing on subsequent enamel demineralization. ASDC J Dent Child 1988; 55: 343-347.
18. Van Amerongen JP, Penning C, Kidd EA, et al. An in vitro assessment of the extent of caries under small occlusal cavities. Caries Res 1992; 26: 89-93.
19. Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA. The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1994; 176: 417-421.
20. Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Smith MM, et al. The use of a caries detector dye in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1989; 167: 132-134.
21. Boston DW, Graver HT. Histobacteriological analysis of acid red dyestainable dentin found beneath intact amalgam restoration. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 65-69.
22. Boston DW, Graver HT. Histological study of an acid red caries-disclosing dye. Oper Dent 1989; 14: 186-192.
23. Van de Rijke JW. Use of dyes in cariology. Int Dent J 1991;41:111-116.
24. Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: A microbiological assessment. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 245-248.
25. Ross G. Air abrasions and caries detection dyes. The new standard of care. Ont Dent 1998; 75: 43-45.
26. Shi XQ, Welander U, Angmar-Mansson B. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiographic examination: An in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2000; 34: 151-158.
27. Hanley, JA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In: Armitage P, Colton T. Encyclopedia of biostatistics, 4. New York: Wiley, 1998; 3738-3745.
28. Dorfman DD, Alf E Jr. Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals-rating-method data. J Math Psych 1969; 6: 487-496.
29. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
30. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992; 27: 723-731.
31. Shao J, Dongsheng T. The jackknife and the bootstrap. New York: Springer, 1996.
32. Klimm W, Knittel B, Koch R, et al. Comparison of three non-invasive methods for early occlusal caries assessment in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33: 297(Abstr 48).
33. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts NB, et al. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33: 261-266.
34. Web address for MRMC software: ftp://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu.
35. Ekstrand K, Qvist V, Thylstrup A. Light microscope study of the effect of probing in occlusal surfaces. Caries Res 1987; 21: 368-374.