Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: An Achilles' heel?

Health Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 479-491

  Skjoldborg, Ulla Slothuus ^a   Gyrd Hansen, Dorte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Cost range; Linearity and additivity assumptions; utility measurement; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DECISION MAKING; DENMARK; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL; INTERVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DENMARK; FEMALE; FINANCING, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 0038517901     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.742     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Beggs S, Cardell S, Hausman J. Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J Econom 1981; 16: 1-19.
2. Train K. Qualitative Choice Analysis. Theory, Econometrics and an Application to Automobile Demand. Cambridge, MA, 1986.
3. Cramer JS. The Logit Model for Economists. Edward Arnold: London, 1991.
4. Boardman AE, Greenberg DH, Vining AR et al. Cost Benefit Analysis. Concepts and Practice. Prentice-Hall: Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.
5. Bradley M. User's Manual for the Speed Version 2.1. Hague Consulting Group, 1991.
6. Ryan M, Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ 1997; 6(3): 261-274.
7. Greene WH. Limdep Version 7.0. Users Manual. Econometric Software Inc. 1995.
8. Anell A, Rosén P. Valfrihet i vården. En empirisk undersökning av preferencer hos allmänhet och vårdpersonal. IHE arbejdsrapport: Lund, 1995; 4 (in Swedish).
9. Houlberg K, Larsen H. Sundhed og Sundhedsvæsen i Storstrøms Amt. Rapport fra brugerundersøgelse 1990: Hvad synes du om sundhedsvæsenet i Storstrøms Amt, ECO-analyse, Odense (in Danish).
10. Jan S, Mooney G, Ryan M et al. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia. Australian NZ J Public Health 2000; 24(1): 64-70.
11. Ratcliffe J. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit willingness-to-pay values. Proceed with caution? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16(1); 270-275.
12. Frandsen A, Gyrd-Hansen D, Petersen S et al. Danskernes ønsker til sundhedsvæsenet. Odense Universitetsforlag, 2000 (in Danish).