A game-theoretic explanation of the administrative lattice in institutions of higher learning

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 377-391

  Ortmann, Andreas ^a   Squire, Richard ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic ratchet; Administrative lattice; C72; D23; D82; I21; Organizational behavior of nonprofits in higher education; Principal agent games

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038512639     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00121-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aron D.J. Firm organization and the economic approach to personnel management. American Economic Review. 80:1990;23-27.
2. Baumol, W.J., Bowen, W.G., 1966. Performing Arts - The Economic Dilemma, Twentieth Century Fund, Cambridge, MA.
3. Birnbaum R. Will you love me in December as you do in May? Why experienced college presidents lose faculty support. Journal of Higher Education. 63:1992;1-25.
4. Bodenhorn H. Teachers, and scholars too: economic scholarship at elite liberal arts colleges. Journal of Economic Education. 28:1997;323-336.
5. Bronner, E., 1998. College tuition rises 4%, outpacing inflation. New York Times, 8 October.
6. Brynjolfson E., Malone T.W., Gurbaxani V., Kambil A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science. 40.12:1994;1628-1644.
7. Chronister, J. 1999. Personal communication.
8. Clotfelter, C.T., 1996. Buying the Best: Cost Escalation in Elite Higher Education. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
9. Cohen M., March J.G., Olsen J.P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly. 17:1972;1-25.
10. Hartley J.E., Robinson M. Economic research at national liberal arts colleges. Journal of Economic Education. 28:1997;337-349.
11. Hoenack, S.A., 1990. Introduction. In: Hoenack, S.A., Collins, E.L. (Eds.), The economics of American universities. Management, Operations and Fiscal Environment. State University of New York, Albany, NY, pp. 1-10.
12. Honan, W.H., 1994. Cost of 4-year degree passes $100,000 mark. The New York Times, 4 May.
13. Hopkins, D.S.P., 1990. The higher education production function: theoretical foundations and empirical findings. In: Hoenack, S.A., Collins, E.L. (Eds.), The economics of American universities. Management, Operations and Fiscal Environment. State University of New York, Albany, NY, pp. 11-32.
14. James, E., 1990. Decision processes and priorities in higher education. In: Hoenack, S.A., Collins, E.L. (Eds.), The economics of American universities. Management, Operations and Fiscal Environment. State University of New York, Albany, NY, pp. 77-106.
15. Larson, E., 1997. Why colleges cost too much. Time, 17 March.
16. Leslie L.L., Rhoades G. Rising administrative costs: on seeking explanations. Journal of Higher Education. 66:1995;197-212.
17. Mabry, T., 1999. College tuition outpaces inflation again. The Wall Street Journal, 12 March.
18. Massy, W.F., 1981. In: Hopkins, D.S.P., Massy, W.R., (Eds.), A microeconomic theory of colleges and universities, pp. 73-130.
19. Massy, W.F., 1998. In: National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education 1998. Remarks on restructuring higher education, pp. 84-91.
20. Massy, W.F., Warner, T.R., 1991. Causes and cures of cost escalation in college and university administrative support services. In: Proceedings of the National Symposium on Strategic Higher Education Finance and Management Issues, National Association of College and University Business Officers, Washington, DC.
21. Massy W.F., Wilger A.K. Productivity in postsecondary education: a new approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 14:1992;361-376.
22. Massy W.F., Zemsky R. Faculty discretionary time. Departments and the 'academic ratchet'. Journal of Higher Education. 65:1994;1-22.
23. McKinsey, Global Institute. 1992. Service Sector Productivity. McKinsey and Company, Washington, DC.
24. McKinsey, Global Institute. 1993. Manufacturing Productivity. McKinsey and Company, Washington, DC.
25. National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education. 1998. Straight talk about college costs and prices. The report of the National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education. Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ.
26. Ortmann A. How to survive in post industrial environments: Adam Smith's advice for to day's colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education. 68:1997;483-501.
27. Ortmann A. The nature and causes of corporate negligence, sham lectures, and ecclesiastical indolence: Adam Smith on joint-stock companies, teachers, and preachers. History of Political Economy. 31:1999;297-315.
28. Ortmann, A., Squire, R.C., 1996. The internal organization of colleges and universities: a game-theoretic approach. Discussion paper #232, Program on Non-profit Organizations, Yale University.
29. Pitchik C., Schotter A. Honesty in a model of strategic information transmission. American Economic Review. 77:1987;1032-1036.
30. Ritter, J., 1996. School puts its principles first. USA Today, 9 December.
31. Rothschild, M., White, L.J., 1991. The university in the marketplace: some insights and some puzzles. Working Paper No. 3853, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
32. Siegfried, J.J., Getz, M., Anderson, K.H., 1995. The snail's pace of innovation in higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19 May, p. A56.
33. Williamson O.E. Managerial discretion and business behavior. American Economic Review. 60:1970;1032-1056.
34. Winston, G.C., Yen, I., 1995. Costs, prices, subsidies, and aid in US higher education. Discussion Paper DP-32, William's Project on the Economics of Higher Education.
35. Zemsky, R.E., 1992. Testimony from the belly of the whale. Policy Perspectives, September, p. 1A-8A.
36. Zemsky R.E., Massy W. Cost containment: committing to a new economic reality. Change. 226:1990;16-22.
37. Zemsky R., Massy W.F., Oedel P. On reversing the ratchet. Change. 25.3:1993;56-62.
38. Zenger T.R., Hesterly W.S. The disaggregation of corporations: selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units. Organization Science. 8.3:1997;209-222.