Stopping and restarting an unfolding action at various times

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56 A, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 601-620

  McGarry, Tim ^a   Chua, Romeo ^b   Franks, Ian M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME;

ARM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0038507699     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000549     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buckolz, E., Hall, C., & Alain, C. (1982). Suppressing response initiation in a choice RT task. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 7, 49-54.
2. Colonius, H. (1990). A note on the stop-signal paradigm, or how to observe the unobservable. Psychological Review, 97, 309-312.
3. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (1995). Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 498-511.
4. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 498-511.
5. Hanes, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (1995). Countermanding saccades in macaque. Visual Neuroscience, 12, 929-937.
6. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.
8. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
9. Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A. (1984). On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 276-291.
10. Logan, G. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. Psychonomic Bulletin, 7, 107-112.
11. McGarry, T., & Franks, I. M. (1997). A horse race between independent processes: Evidence for a phantom point of no return in the preparation of a speeded motor response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1120-113.
12. McGarry, T., Inglis, J. T., & Franks, I. M. (2000). Against a final ballistic process in the control of voluntary action: Evidence using the Hoffmann reflex. Motor Control, 4, 469-485.
13. Ollman, R. T. (1973). Simple reactions with random countermanding of the "go" signal. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 571-581). New York: Academic Press.
14. Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. (1986). The point of no return in choice reaction time: Controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 243-258.
15. Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. (1990). Does motor programming necessitate response execution? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 183-198.
16. Rieger, M., & Gauggel, S. (1999). Inhibitory after-effects in the stop-signal paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 509-518.
17. Slater-Hammel, A.T. (1960). Reliability, accuracy, and refractoriness of a transit reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 217-228.