Sensitivity to the acceleration of looming stimuli

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 258-261

  Trewhella, James ^a,b   Edwards, Mark ^a   Ibbotson, Michael R ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Acceleration; Deceleration; Human; Looming; Time to contact

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECELERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL SENSITIVITY; SIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0038491414     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00641.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Runeson S. Psychol Rev, 1974; 37: 3-23.
2. Gottsdanker RM et al. Br J Psychol, 1961; 52: 31-42.
3. Werkhoven P et al. Vision Res 1992; 32: 2313-29.
4. Snowden RJ, Braddick OJ. Vision Res 1991; 31: 907-14.
5. McKee SP. Vision Res 1961; 21: 491-500.
6. Regan D, Beverly KI. Vision Res 1973; 13: 2403-15.
7. Ullman S. Behav Brain Sci, 1980; 3: 373-415.
8. Gibson JJ, ed. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1979.
9. Regan D, Beverly KI. Vision Res 1978; 18: 415-21.
10. Regan D, Beverly KI. Vision Res 1979; 19: 1331-42.
11. Smith AT, Snowden RJ, eds. Visual Detection of Motion. London: Academic Press, 1994.