Why liberals should accept financial incentives for organ procurement

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 19-36

  Veatch, Robert M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; JUSTICE; LAW; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; ORGAN DONOR; PURCHASING; REVIEW; SOCIAL WELFARE; ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; DONOR; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FEE; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POLICY; POVERTY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED STATES;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

COERCION; FEES AND CHARGES; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; POVERTY; PREJUDICE; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038482088     PISSN: 10546863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/ken.2003.0007     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Alexander, J. Wesley. 1992. Pro: Rewarded Gifting Should Be Tried. Transplantation & Immunology Letter 8 (1): 4, 6.
2. American Medical Association. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. 1995. Financial Incentives for Organ Donation. Archives of Internal Medicine 155: 581-89.
3. Banks, Gloria J. 1995. Legal & Ethical Safeguards: Protection of Society's Most Vulnerable Participants in a Commercialized Organ Transplantation System. American Journal of Law & Medicine 21: 45-110.
4. Callender, Clive. 1996. Testimony of Group 13. Presented at Increasing Organ Donation Liver Allocation, 10-12 December, Natcher Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
5. Caplan, Arthur. 1983. Organ Transplants Must Not Be Put on Highest-Bidder Basis. Atlanta Constitution (2 October): 23-32.
6. _. 1984a. Ethical and Policy Issues in the Procurement of Cadaver Organs for Transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine 311: 981-83.
7. _. 1984b. Ethical Issues in the Sale of Human Organs for Transplantation. Bioethics Reporter (January): 6-8.
8. Cohen, Lloyd R. 1989. Increasing the Supply of Transplant Organs: The Virtues of a Futures Market. George Washington Law Review 58: 1-51.
9. Daar, A. S. 1992. Rewarded Gifting. Transplantation Proceedings 24: 2207-11.
10. Dewhurst, F. W. 1987. A Computerized Kidney Donorship Register. Journal of Medical Systems 11: 381-88.
11. Dosseter, J. B. 1992. Rewarded Gifting: Is It Ever Ethically Acceptable? Transplantation Proceedings 24: 2092-94.
12. Faden, Ruth, and Beauchamp, Tom L., in collaboration with Nancy N. P. King. 1986. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Gill, Michael B., and Sade, Robert M. 2002. Paying for Kidneys: The Case against Prohibition. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12: 17-45.
14. Goyal, Madhav; Mehta, Ravindra L.; Schneiderman, Lawrence J.; and Sehgal, Ashwini R. 2002. Economic and Health Consequences of Selling a Kidney in India. Journal of American Medical Association 288: 1589-93.
15. Guttman, Ronald D. 1991. The Meaning of "The Economics and Ethics of Alternative Cadaveric Organ Procurement Policies." Yale Journal on Regulation 8: 453-62.
16. _. 1992. Future Markets: Claims and Meanings. Transplantation Proceedings 24: 2203.
17. Hansmann, Henry. 1989. The Economics and Ethics of Markets for Human Organs. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 14: 57-85.
18. Kahan, Barry D. 1992. Rewarded Gifting - PRO and CON: Bringing the Arguments Into Focus. Transplantation & Immunology Letter 8 (1): 3.
19. Murray, Thomas H. 1992. The Moral Repugnance of Rewarded Gifting. Transplantation & Immunology Letter 8 (1): 5, 7.
20. Peters, Tom G. 1991. Life or Death: The Issue of Payment in Cadaveric Organ Donation. Journal of the American Medical Association 265: 1302-5.
21. Reddy, K. C. 1992. A Perspective on Reality. In Ethical Problems in Dialysis and Transplantation, ed. Carl M. Kjellstrand and John B. Dossetor, pp. 155-61. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
22. Rothman, David J. 2002. Ethical and Social Consequences of Selling a Kidney. Journal of American Medical Association 13: 1640-41.
23. Surman, Owen S. 2002. The Ethics of Partial-Liver Donation. New England Journal of Medicine 346: 1038.
24. The Gallup Organization, Inc. 1993. Survey prepared for the Partnership for Organ Donation and Harvard School of Public Health, 25-26 March. Available at: http-//www.transweb.org/reference/articles/gallup_survey/gallup_index.html. Accessed 8 August 2002.
25. Veatch, Robert M. 1974. Human Experimentation: The Crucial Choices Ahead. Prism (July): 58, 61, 71.
26. _. 1977. Governmental Population Incentives: Ethical Issues at Stake. Studies in Family Planning 9: 100-108.
27. _. 1984. Statement Before the Subcommittee for Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology. In Procurement and Allocation of Human Organs for Transplantation: Hearings before the Sub-committee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology, pp. 343-53. U.S. House of Representatives, Ninety-Eighth Congress, 7, 9 November. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. _. 1991. Routine Inquiry About Organ Donation - An Alternative to Presumed Consent. New England Journal of Medicine 325: 1246-49.
29. _. 2000. Transplantation Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30. Williams, Walter. 1984. Vital Organs - Let the Market Decide. Washington Times (19 April): C1.