How does industry respond to waste policy instruments - Finnish experiences

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-11

  Kautto, Petrus ^a   Melanen, Matti ^a  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Clean technology; Industrial ecology; Industry; Policy instruments; Waste

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; PUBLIC POLICY; WASTE DISPOSAL;

CLEAN TECHNOLOGY;

WASTE TREATMENT;

EID: 0038481546     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00023-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Finland in Figures. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, 2001. In http://www.stat.fi/tk/tp/tasku/suomilukuina_en.html. (Visited on January 30, 2001.).
2. Environment 2010: Our Future, Our Choice. Proposal presented by the Commission of the European Communities for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Community Environment Action Programme 2001-2010. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 2001. In http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/newprg/index.htm . (Visited on February 5, 2001.).
3. National Waste Plan until 2005. The Finnish Environment 260. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment Finland, 1998. (In Finnish with an extended English summary.).
4. Environment in the European Union at the turn of the century. Environmental Assessment Report No. 2. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 1999.
5. Lash S. Discourse or figure? Postmodernism as a 'regime of signification'. Theory, Culture and Society. 5:(2-3):1998;533-542.
6. Ilomäki M., Melanen M. Waste minimisation in small and medium-sized enterprises - do environmental management systems help? Journal of Cleaner Production. 9:(3):2001;209-217.
7. Vedung E. Policy instruments: typologies and theories. Bemelmans-Videc M.-L., Rist R.C., Vedung E. Carrots, sticks and sermons. Policy instruments and their evaluation. 1998;21-58 Transaction, New Brunswick.
8. Oosterhuis F.H., de Savornin Lohman A.F. Environment and taxation: The case of the Netherlands. OECD: Environment and taxation: the cases of the Netherlands, Sweden and the United States. 1994;7-50 OECD, Paris.
9. Porter M, van der Linde Cl. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review 1995;September-October:120-34.
10. Porter M., van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment - competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9:(4):1995;97-118.
11. Wallace D. Environmental policy and industrial innovation. Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan. 1995;Royal Institute of International Affairs, Energy and Environmental Programme, London.
12. Kolk A. Economics of environmental management. 2000;Pearson Education, Harlow.
13. Paton B. Voluntary environmental initiatives and sustainable industry. A paper presented at the 1999 Greening of Industry Network Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, 1999. In http://greening99.bschool.unc.edu/best_paper_proceedings.html . (Visited on March 5, 2001.).
14. Rossi P.H., Freeman H.E. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 1993;Sage, Newbury Park.
15. Vedung E. Public policy and program evaluation. 1997;Transaction, New Brunswick.
16. Yin R.K. Case study research. Design and methods. 2nd ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series Volume 5. 1994;Sage, Thousand Oaks.
17. Fisher F. Evaluating public policy. 1995;Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
18. Taylor S.J., Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methodsThe search for meanings. 1984;Wiley, New York.
19. Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. 2nd ed. 2001;Sage, London.
20. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 14:(4):1989;532-550.
21. Mäenpää I, Juutinen A, Puustinen K, Rintala J, Risku-Norja H, Veijalainen S, Viitanen M. Luonnonvarojen kokonaiskäyttö Suomessa. The Finnish Environment 428. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment Finland, 2000. (In Finnish with an English abstract Natural resource use of Finland.).
22. Ehrenfeld J., Gertler N. Industrial ecology in practice: the evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 1:(1):1997;67-79.
23. Lovio R. Have environmental management systems had a positive impact on the environmental performance of Finnish industrial sites? A paper presented at the 16th EGOS Colloquium, Helsinki, Finland, 2000.
24. King A., Lenox M. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry's Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal. 43:(4):2000;698-716.
25. Zackrisson M, Enroth M, Widing A. Miljöledningssystem - papperstiger eller kraftfultt verktyg. IVL Rapport B 1351. Stockholm: Svenska Miljöinstitut AB, 1999. (In Swedish with an English abstract Environmental management systems - paper tiger or powerful tool.).
26. Lindhqvist T. Extended producer responsibility in cleaner production. Policy principle to promote environmental improvements of product systems. IIIEE Dissertations 2000:2. Lund: Lund University, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, 2000.
27. Clayton A., Spinardi G., Williams R. Policies for cleaner technologies. A new agenda for government and industry. 1999;Earthscan, London.
28. Commission of the European Communities. Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 2001. In http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ipp/ . (Visited on February 13, 2001.).