Integrated Cues of Voicing and Vowel Length in German: A Production Study

Language and Speech

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 353-376

  Braunschweiler, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acoustic phonetic; Experimental phonology; Segment duration; Vowel lengthening; Word production

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038473083     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002383099704000403     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BRAUN, A. (1988). Zum Merkmal "fortis/lenis." Phonologische Betrachtungen und instrumental-phonetische Untersuchungen and einem mittelhessischen Dialekt. In J. Göschel (Ed.), ZDL, Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 55.
2. BRAUNSCHWEILER, N. (1993). Stimmhaftigkeit und Vokallänge im gesprochenen Deutsch: Produktions-und Perzeptionsexperimente zur Bestimmung der akustischen Schlüsselparameter. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Konstanz.
3. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219-252.
4. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201-251.
5. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 299-320.
6. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180.
7. CELEX Lexical Database. (1995). Release, 2, German Version 2.5, [CD-ROM]. Center for Lexical Information, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
8. CHEN, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22, 129-159.
9. CLARK, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
10. CRYSTAL, T. H., & HOUSE, A. S. (1982). Segmental durations in connected speech signals: Preliminary results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 705-716.
11. DAVIS, S., & SUMMERS, W. Van. (1989). Vowel length and closure duration in word-medial VC sequence. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 339-353.
12. DOCHERTY, G. J. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Netherlands Phonetic Archives, 9. Berlin: Foris.
13. FOWLER, C. A. (1992). Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops. There are no contrast effects here. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 143-165.
14. FUJIMURA, O., & LOVINS, J. B. (1978). Syllables as concatenative phonetic units. In A. Bell & J. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp. 107-120). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. GOLDSTEIN, L., & BROWMAN, C. P. (1986). Representation of voicing contrasts using articulatory gestures. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 339-342.
16. HOUSE, A. S., & FAIRBANKS, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 103-113.
17. JAVKIN, H. R. (1976). The perceptual basis of vowel duration differences associated with the voiced/voiceless distinction. Report of the Berkeley Phonology Laboratory, No. 1, 78-92.
18. JAEGER, J. J. (1983). The fortis/lenis question: Evidence from Zapotec and Jawoñ. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 177-189.
19. JONGMAN, A., SERENO, J. A., RAAIJMAKERS, M., & LAHIRI, A. (1992). The phonological representation of [voice] in speech perception. Language and Speech, 35, 137-152.
20. KEATING, P. A. (1985). Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics. Essays in honour of Peter Ladefoged (pp. 115-132). Orlando: Academic Press.
21. KLATT, D. H. (1973). Interaction between two factors that influence vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1102-1104.
22. KLATT, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208-1221.
23. KLUENDER, K., DIEHL, R., & WRIGHT, B. (1988). Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 153-169.
24. KOHLER, K. J. (1977). The production of plosives. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik an der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 8, 30-110.
25. KOHLER, K. J. (1979a). Dimensions in the perception of fortis and lenis plosives. Phonetica, 36, 332-334.
26. KOHLER, K. J. (1979b). Parameters in the production and perception of fortis and lenis plosives in German and French. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik an der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 12, 261-291.
27. KOHLER, K. J. (1980). Timing of articulatory control in the production of plosives. Phonetica, 38, 116-125.
28. 0 in the production of lenis and fortis plosives. Phonetica, 39, 199-218.
29. KOHLER, K. J. (1984). Phonetic explanation in phonology: The feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica, 41, 150-174.
30. KOHLER, K. J., & KÜNZEL, H. J. (1978). The temporal organization of closing-opening movements for sequences of vowels and plosives in German. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik an der Universität Kiel (AIPUK), 10, 117-166.
31. KUIJPERS, C. T. L. (1993). Temporal coordination in speech development. A study on voicing contrast and assimilation of voice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
32. LADEFOGED, P., & MADDIESON, I. (1996). The sounds of the world languages. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
33. LAEUFER, C. (1992). Patterns of voicing-conditioned vowel duration in French and English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 411-440.
34. LAHIRI, A., RIAD, T., & JACOBS, H. (in press.) Diachrony. In H. van der Hulst (Ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. LISKER, L. (1957). Closure duration and the intervocalic voiced-voiceless distinction in English. Language, 33, 42-49.
36. LISKER, L. (1986). "Voicing" in English: A catalog of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29, 3-11.
37. LISKER, L., & ABRAMSON, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
38. MAACK, A. (1953). Die Beeinflussung der Sonantendauer durch die Nachbarkonsonanten. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 7, 104-128.
39. MADDIESON, I. (1985). Phonetic cues to syllabification. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics. Essays in honour of Peter Ladefoged (pp. 203-221). Orlando: Academic Press.
40. MITLEB, F. M. (1984). Voicing effect on vowel duration is not an absolute universal. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 23-27.
41. PAUL, H., MOSER, H., & SCHRÖBLER, I. (1969). Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
42. PORT, R. F., AL-ANI, S., & MAEDA, S. (1980). Temporal compensation and universal phonetics. Phonetica, 37, 235-252.
43. RAMERS, K. H. (1988). Vokalquantität und -qualität im Deutschen. Linguistische Arbeiten, 213, Tübingen: Niemeyer.
44. SANTERRE, L., & SUEN, C. Y. (1981). Why look for a single feature to distinguish stop cognates? Journal of Phonetics, 9, 163-174.
45. SENDLMEIER, W. F. (1981). Der Einfluss von Qualität und Quantität auf die Perzeption betonter Vokale des Deutschen. Phonetica, 38, 291-308.
46. SLIS, I. H., & COHEN, A. (1969 a, b). On the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction I+II. Language and Speech, 12, 80-102, 137-155.
47. STOCK, D. (1971). Untersuchungen zur Stimmhaftigkeit hochdeutscher Phonemrealisationen. IPK Forschungsberichte, 28, Hamburg: Buske.
48. WALSH, T., & PARKER, F. (1981). Vowel length and "voicing" in a following consonant. Journal of Phonetics, 9, 305-308.
49. WEISS, R. (1976). The perception of vowel length and quality in German: An experimental-phonetic investigation. Hamburger phonetische Beiträge, 20. Hamburg: Buske.