A morphometric study on morphological plasticity of shell form in crevice-dwelling Pterioida (Bivalvia)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 285-297

  Ubukata, Takao ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Eigenshape analysis; Irregular shell form; Relative warp analysis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SHELL;

BIVALVIA; PTERIOIDA; PTERIOIDEA;

EID: 0038468459     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00144.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bookstein FL. 1989. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11: 567-585.
2. Bookstein FL. 1990. Higher order features of shape change for landmark data. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, eds. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, 237-250.
3. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bookstein FL. 1993. A brief history of morphometric synthesis. In: Marcus LF, Bello E, García-Valdecasas A, eds. Contribution to morphometrics. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, 15-40.
5. Bookstein FL. 1996a. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric systhesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 58: 313-365.
6. Bookstein FL. 1996b. Standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, eds. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum, 153-168.
7. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. New York: Wiley.
8. Kauffman EG. 1969. Functional morphology of bivalve shell. In: Moore RC, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, part N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia. Boulder: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, N140-N183.
9. Kendall DG, Barden D, Carne TK, Le H. 1999. Shape and shape theory. New York: Wiley.
10. Lestrel PE. 1997. Fourier descriptors and their applications in biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Lohmann GP. 1983. Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: a general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape. Mathematical Geology 15: 659-672.
12. Lohmann GP, Schweitzer PN. 1990. On eigenshape analysis. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, eds. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometries workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, 145-166.
13. MacLeod N. 1999. Generalizing and estimating the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 25: 107-138.
14. MacLeod N. 2000. ESHAPESD - standard eigenshape analysis. London: Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum.
15. MacLeod N, Rose KD. 1993. Inferring locomotor behavior in Paleogene mammals via eigenshape analysis. American Journal of Science 293-A: 300-355.
16. Marcus LF, Corti M. 1996. Overview of the new, or geometric morphometrics. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, eds. Advances in morphometries. New York: Plenum, 1-13.
17. Rohlf FJ. 1986. Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates. Mathematical Geology 18: 845-857.
18. Rohlf FJ. 1993. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. In: Marcus LF, Bello E, García-Valdecasas A, eds. Contribution to morphometrics. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, 131-159.
19. Rohlf FJ. 1996. Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, eds. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum, 117-129.
20. Rohlf FJ. 1998. TPSRELW - Thin-Plate Spline Relative Warp Analysis, Version 1.21. New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
21. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-132.
22. Rohlf FJ, Slice DN. 1990. Extension of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposiotion of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
23. Savazzi E. 1998. Constructional morphology of the bivalve Pedum. In: Johnston PA, Haggart JW, eds. Bivalves: an eon of evolution. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 413-422.
24. Savazzi E. 1999. Boring, nestling and tube-dwelling bivalves. In: Savazzi E, ed. Functional morphology of the invertebrate skeleton. Chichester: Wiley. 205-238.
25. Schweitzer PN, Lohmann GP. 1990. Life-history and the evolution of ontogeny in the ostracode genus Cyprideis. Paleobiology 16: 107-125.
26. Slice DN, Bookstein FL, Marcus LF, Rohlf FJ. 1996. A glossary for geometric morphometrics. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, eds. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum, 531-551.
27. Stanley SM. 1970. Relation of shell form to life habits in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America, Memoir 125: 1-296.
28. Thompson DW. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Ubukata T. 1994. Architectural constraints on the morphogenesis of prismatic structure in Bivalvia. Palaeontology 37: 241-261.
30. Ubukata T. 1997. Mantle kinematics and formation of commarginal shell sculpture in Bivalvia. Paleontological Research 1: 132-143.
31. Yonge CM. 1953. The monomyarian condition in the Lamelibranchia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 62: 443-478.
32. Zahn CT, Roskies RZ. 1972. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-21: 269-281.