Sonographic morphological pattern in the pre-operative prediction of ovarian masses

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 332-337

  Benjapibal, Mongkol ^a   Phatihattakorn, Chayawat ^a   Iamurairat, Wiwat ^a   Sunsaneevitayakul, Prasert ^a   Suphanit, Issaracha ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Morphological Pattern; Ovarian Tumor; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MORPHOLOGY; OVARY CANCER; OVARY TUMOR; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; MIDDLE AGED; OVARY DISEASE; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN DISEASES; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0038462287     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1997. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 5-27.
2. Piver MS, Baker TR, Piedmonte M, Sandecki AM. Epidemiology and etiology of ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 1991; 18: 177-85.
3. Deerasamee S, Martin N, Sontipong S, et al, eds. Cancer in Thailand, Vol. 2, 1992-1994. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1999.
4. Benacerraf BR, Finkler NJ, Wojciechowski C, Knapp RC. Sonographic accuracy in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. J Reprod Med 1990; 35: 491-5.
5. Granberg S, Norstrom A, Wikland M. Tumors in the lower pelvis as imaged by vaginal sonography. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 37: 224-9.
6. Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren WB. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian disease: Evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 70-6.
7. Lerner JP, Timor-Tritsch IE, Federman A, Abramovich G. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 81-5.
8. Ferrazzi E, Zenetta G, Dordoni D, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: Comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 192-7.
9. Wanapirak C, Nimitwongsakul S, Tongsong T. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumor. J Med Assoc Thai 2001; 84: 30-5.
10. Reles A, Wein U, Lichtenegger W. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography and conventional sonography in the pre-operative assessment of adnexal mass. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25: 217-25.
11. Vera MT, Okai T, Mukubo M, Kozuma S, Maeda T, Mizuno M. Ultrasonic evaluation and classification of ovarian tumors. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 12: 89-97.
12. Kawai M, Kano T, Kikkawa F, Maeda O, Oguchi H, Tomoda Y. Transvaginal Doppler ultrasound with color flow imaging in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 163-7.
13. Seroy SF, Scully RE, Sobin IH. Histological typing of ovarian tumors: International histological classification of tumours, No. 9. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1973.
14. Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 922-9.
15. Tingulstad S, Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE, et al. Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the pre-operative diagnosis of pelvic masses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 826-31.
16. Morgante G, Marca AI, Ditto A, Leo VD. Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum. CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 524-7.
17. Scheider VL, Schneider A, Reed KL, Hatch KD. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 83: 983-8.
18. Chou C, Chang CH, Yao B, Kuo H. Color Doppler ultrasonography and serum CA 125 in the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. J Clin Ultrasound 1994; 22: 491-6.
19. Kurjak A, Predanic M. New scoring system for prediction of ovarian malignancy based on transvaginal color Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 631-8.
20. Carter J, Saltzman A, Hartenbach E, Fowler J, Carson L, Twiggs LB. Flow characteristics in benign and malignant gynecologic tumors using transvaginal color flow Doppler. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 125-30.
21. Twickler DM, Forte TB, Santos-Ramos R, McIntire D, Harris P, Scott D. The ovarian tumor index predicts risk of malignancy. Cancer 1999; 86: 2280-90.
22. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Cambell S. Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using an artificial neural network. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 21-30.