Module categories over the drinfeld double of a finite group

International Mathematics Research Notices

Volumn , Issue 27, 2003, Pages 1507-1520

  Ostrik, Viktor ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038457662     PISSN: 10737928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/s1073792803205079     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. E. Aljadeff, P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, and D. Nikshych, On twisting of finite-dimensional Hopf algebras, preprint, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/math.QA/0107167.
2. B. Bakalov and A. Kirillov Jr., Lectures on Tensor Categories and Modular Functors, University Lecture Series, vol. 21, American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island, 2001.
3. R. E. Behrend, P. A. Pearce, V. B. Petkova, and J.-B. Zuber, Boundary conditions in rational conformal field theories, Nuclear Phys. B 579 (2000), no. 3, 707-773.
4. J. Böckenhauer, D. E. Evans, and Y. Kawahigashi, Chiral structure of modular invariants for subfactors, Comm. Math. Phys. 210 (2000), no. 3, 733-784.
5. A. Coste, T. Gannon, and P. Ruelle, Finite group modular data, Nuclear Phys. B 581 (2000), no. 3, 679-717.
6. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
7. R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. Verlinde, and H. Verlinde, The operator algebra of orbifold models, Comm. Math. Phys. 123 (1989), no. 3, 485-526.
8. P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, On fusion categories, preprint, 2002, http://arxiv.org/abs/math.QA/0203060.
9. J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, Category theory for conformal boundary conditions, preprint, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/math.CT/0106050.
10. T. Gannon, Boundary conformal field theory and fusion ring representations, Nuclear Phys. B 627 (2002), no. 3, 506-564.
11. A. Kirillov Jr., Modular categories and orbifold models II, preprint, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/math.QA/0110221.
12. 2 conformal field theories, Adv. Math. 171 (2002), no. 2, 183-227.
13. G. Moore and N. Seiberg, Classical and quantum conformal field theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 123 (1989), no. 2, 177-254.
14. M. Müger, From Subfactors to Categories and Topology I. Frobenius algebras in and Morita equivalence of tensor categories, preprint, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/math.CT/0111204.
15. _, From Subfactors to Categories and Topology II. The quantum double of tensor categories and subfactors, preprint, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/math.CT/0111205.
16. D. Nikshych, On the structure of weak Hopf algebras, Adv. Math. 170 (2002), no. 2,257-286.
17. A. Ocneanu, The classification of subgroups of quantum SU(N), Quantum Symmetries in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics (Bariloche, 2000), Contemp. Math., vol. 294, American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island, 2002, pp. 133-159.
18. V. Ostrik, Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants, preprint, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/math.QA/0111139.
19. S. Yamagami, Group symmetry in tensor categories and duality for orbifolds, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 167 (2002), no. 1, 83-128.