Combined perceptual or motor-related expectancies modulated by type of cue

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 649-666

  Mattler, Uwe ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0038457019     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194589     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. BRIAND, K. A., & KLEIN, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"? On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 228-241.
2. CASEY, B. J., THOMAS, K. M., WELSH, T. F., BADGAIYAN, R. D., ECCARD, C. H., JENNINGS, J. R., & CRONE, E. A. (2000). Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 8728-8733.
3. CORBETTA, M., & SHULMAN, G. L. (1998). Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. Philosophical Trans-actions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1353-1362.
4. DEIBER, M. P., IBANEZ, V., SADATO, N., & HALLETT, M. (1996). Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 233-247.
5. DE JONG, R., WlERDA, M., MULDER, G., & MULDER, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 682-692.
6. DESIMONE, R., & DUNCAN, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
7. ERIKSEN, C. W., & YEH, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 583-597.
8. FOUND, A., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
9. FU, Q. G., FLAMENT, J. D., COLTZ, J. D., & EBNER, T. J. (1995). Temporal encoding of movement kinematics in the discharge of primate primary motor and premotor neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 836-854.
10. GOODMAN, D., & KELSO, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475-495.
11. HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1981). Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 291-302.
12. KASTNER, S., & UNGERLEIDER, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315-341.
13. KINGSTONE, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 69-104.
14. KINGSTONE, A., & KLEIN, R. (1991). Combining shape and position expectancies: Hierarchical processing and selective inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 512-519.
15. KLEIN, R. [M.] (1980). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 259-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. KLEIN, R. M. (1994). Perceptual-motor expectancies interact with covert visual orienting under conditions of endogenous but not exogenous control. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 167-181.
17. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
18. KLEIN, R. [M.], & HANSEN, E. (1987). Spotlight failure in covert orienting. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 447-450.
19. KLEIN, R. [M.], & HANSEN, E. (1990). Chronometric analysis of apparent spotlight failure in endogenous visual orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 790-801.
20. LAMBERT, A. (1987). Expecting different categories at different locations and spatial selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 61-76.
21. LAMBERT, A., & HOCKEY, R. (1986). Selective attention and performance with a multidimensional visual display. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 484-495.
22. LEUTHOLD, H., SOMMER, W., & ULRICH, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307-323.
23. LUCK, S. J. (1998). Neurophysiology of selective attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 257-296). Hove, U.K.: Psychological Press.
24. MATTLER, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167-187.
25. MATTLER, U. (in press). Combined expectancy effects are modulated by the relation between expectancy-cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
26. MILÁN, E. G., & TORNAY, F. J. (2001). Spotlight failure effect in exogenous orienting. Acta Psychologica, 108, 209-218.
27. MILLER, J. O. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 273-296.
28. MILLER, J. O. (1985). A hand advantage in preparation of simple keypress responses: Reply to Reeve and Proctor (1984). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 221-233.
29. MILLER, J. (1987). Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 425-434.
30. MILLER, J. (1988). Response-compatibility effects in focused-attention tasks: A same-hand advantage in response activation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 83-89.
31. MOTTER, B. C. (1994). Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 2178-2189.
32. MURPHY, F. C., & KLEIN, R. M. (1998). The effects of nicotine on spatial and non-spatial expectancies in a covert orienting task. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1103-1114.
33. NEELY, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading of activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
34. OSMAN, A., MOORE, C. M., & ULRICH, R. (1995). Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: Precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychologica, 90, 111-127.
35. POSNER, M. I., & RAICHLE, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library.
36. POSNER, M. I., & SNYDER, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. POSNER, M. I., SNYDER, C. R. R., & DAVIDSON, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
38. RABBITT, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
39. REEVE, T. G., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1984). On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 541-553.
40. REEVE, T. G., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1985). Nonmotoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 234-241.
41. REQUIN, J., RIEHLE, A., & SEAL, J. (1993). Neuronal networks for movement preparation. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 745-769). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. ROSENBAUM, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
43. ROSENBAUM, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 231-274). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
44. ROSENBAUM, D. A., & KORNBLUM, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223-243.
45. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (1997). On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 389-403.
46. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
47. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
48. ULRICH, R., GIRAY, M., & SCHÄRFER, R. (1990). Is it possible to prepare the second component of a movement before the first one? Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 125-148.
49. ULRICH, R., MOORE, C., & OSMAN, A. (1993). Lateralisiertes Bereitschaftpotential und Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei partieller Vor-information eines Handlungsparameters [Lateralized readiness potential and reaction times: The effect of partial response cues]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 40, 310-325.
50. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
51. WOLFE, J. M. (1996). Extending guided search: Why guided search needs a preattentive "item map." In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 247-270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52. WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
53. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEN, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433