Spectral quark model and low-energy hadron phenomenology

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 67, Issue 7, 2003, Pages

  Arriola, Enrique Ruiz ^a   Broniowski, Wojciech ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHIRALITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHENOMENOLOGY; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PHYSICS; PREDICTION; TECHNIQUE; VELOCITY;

EID: 0038439591     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.074021     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27, 195 (1991).
2. S.P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
3. M.K. Volkov, Part. Nuclei B24, 1 (1993).
4. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
5. C.V. Christov, A. Blotz, H.-C. Kim, P. Pobylitsa, T. Watabe, T. Meissner, E. Ruiz Arriola, and K. Goeke, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37, 91 (1996).
6. R. Alkofer, H. Reinhardt, and H. Weigel, Phys. Rep. 265, 139 (1996).
7. G. Ripka, Quarks Bound by Chiral Fields (Clarendon, Oxford, 1997).
8. E. Ruiz Arriola, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 4443 (2002).
9. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
10. R. Delbourgo and P.C. West, J. Phys. A 10, 1049 (1977).
11. R. Delbourgo, Nuovo Cimento A 49, 484 (1979).
12. E. Ruiz Arriola, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Lepton Scattering, Hadrons and QCD, Adelaide, Australia, 2001, edited by W. Melnitchouk, A. Schreiber, P. Tandy, and A. W. Thomas (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
13. R.L. Jaffe and G.C. Ross, Phys. Lett. 93B, 313 (1980).
14. R. L. Jaffe, in Proceedings of the Los Alamos School, 1985, edited by M. B. Johnson and A. Picklesimer (Wiley, New York, 1986).
15. R.M. Davidson and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Lett. B 359, 273 (1995).
16. R.M. Davidson and E. Ruiz Arriola, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 1791 (2002).
17. E. Ruiz Arriola and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 094016 (2002).
18. P.O. Bowman, U.M. Heller, and A.G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014505 (2002).
19. P.O. Bowman, U.M. Heller, D.B. Leinweber, and A.G. Williams, hep-lat/0209129.
20. B. Haeri, Phys. Rev. D 38, 3799 (1988).
21. T.D. Lee and G.C. Wick, Nucl. Phys. B9, 209 (1969).
22. R.E. Cutkosky, P.V. Landshoff, D.I. Olive, and J. Polkinghorne, Nucl. Phys. B12, 281 (1969).
23. D.G. Boulware and D.J. Gross, Nucl. Phys. B233, 1 (1984).
24. M. Praszałowicz and A. Rostworowski, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074003 (2001).
25. B.L. Ioffe, Yad. Fiz. 66, 32 (2003) [Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 30 (2003)].
26. S.V. Mikhailov and A.V. Radyushkin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 49, 494 (1989).
27. S.V. Mikhailov and A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 45, 1754 (1992).
28. A.P. Bakulev and S.V. Mikhailov, Phys. Rev. D 65, 114511 (2002).
29. A.E. Dorokhov and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094007 (2002).
30. V.M. Belyaev and B.L. Ioffe, Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 493 (1982).
31. B.L. Ioffe and K.N. Zyablyuk, Technical Report, 2002, hep-ph/0207183.
32. B. Renner, Current Algebras and Their Applications (Pergamon Press, New York, 1968).
33. R. Delbourgo, Aust. J. Phys. 52, 681 (1999).
34. V. Sauli, J. High Energy Phys. 02, 001 (2003).
35. Our conventions are as follows: We take (Formula presented) for ingoing and (Formula presented) for outgoing particles. For free massless particles the irreducible functions are normalized according to (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) The convention for the Dirac matrices and the metric tensor is the one of Ref. 9.
36. The use of the dimensional regularization guarantees gauge invariance, with no further subtractions, hence for simplicity we use it throughout the paper in the applications with vector and axial currents.
37. W. Broniowski, G. Ripka, E.N. Nikolov, and K. Goeke, Z. Phys. A 354, 421 (1996).
38. H. Pagels and S. Stokar, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2947 (1979).
39. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 507 (1967).
40. J.L.C. Bernard, A. Duncan, and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 12, 792 (1975).
41. W. Broniowski, hep-ph/9911204.
42. For instance, a modification of the vector vertex by providing additional tensor coupling is capable of curing the problem of the second Weinberg sum rule. This important issue will be studied elsewhere.
43. R. Tarrach, Z. Phys. C 2, 221 (1979).
44. P. Faccioli, A. Schwenk, and E.V. Shuryak, hep-ph/0202027.
45. C.J. Bebek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1326 (1976)
46. C.J. BebekPhys. Rev. D 17, 1693 (1978).
47. The Jefferson Lab F(pi), J. Volmer Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1713 (2001).
48. H.P. Blok, G.M. Huber, and D.J. Mack, nucl-ex/0208011.
49. NA7 Collaboration, S.R. Amendolia, Nucl. Phys. B277, 168 (1986).
50. G.P. Lepage and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980).
51. A.E. Dorokhov, talk presented at the 37th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and Hadronic Interactions, Les Arcs, France, 2002, hep-ph/0206088.
52. A.E. Dorokhov, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 77, 68 (2002).
53. D. Müller, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3855 (1995).
54. A. Schmedding and O. Yakovlev, Phys. Rev. D 62, 116002 (2000).
55. A.P. Bakulev, S.V. Mikhailov, and N.G. Stefanis, this issue Phys. Rev. D 67, 074012 (2003).
56. CLEO Collaboration, J. Gronberg, Phys. Rev. D 57, 33 (1998).
57. S.L. Adler, Phys. Rev. D 4, 3497 (1971).
58. M.V. Terent’ev, Phys. Lett. 38B, 419 (1972).
59. R. Aviv and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2372 (1972).
60. H. Weigel, E. Ruiz Arriola, and L. Gamberg, Nucl. Phys. B560, 383 (1999).
61. J. R. Ellis, in Les Houches 1976, Proceedings, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions At High Energies, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 1–114 and report—ELLIS J (76, REC.JAN 77).
62. G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B126, 298 (1977).
63. P.J. Sutton, A.D. Martin, R.G. Roberts, and W.J. Stirling, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2349 (1992).
64. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984).
65. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
66. L.-H. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1199 (1986).
67. E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Lett. 253B, 430 (1991).
68. C. Schuren, E. Ruiz Arriola, and K. Goeke, Nucl. Phys. A547, 612 (1992).
69. If one extrapolates (Formula presented) to the real axis, as suggested by the standard Lehmann representation, Eq. (2.2), there appear, for (Formula presented) end-point non-integrable singularities at the branch points (Formula presented) If one insists on a real spectral function, one may do so but then one has to proceed by analytic continuation in (Formula presented) or derivation with respect to (Formula presented) after computing the (Formula presented) integral. Alternatively, this is equivalent to a distributional interpretation of the spectral function (Formula presented) and its (generalized) derivatives using the well known distribution (Formula presented) (see, e.g., the classical work 71 for a rigorous discussion).
70. Obviously, (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) are gauge-dependent quantities. The data of Refs. 1819 correspond to the Landau and Laplacian gauges. A natural question arises where our results incorporate the choice of the QCD gauge at the microscopic level. We notice two sources of ambiguities in our approach: the arbitrariness of the transverse terms in the solutions to the Ward-Takahashi identities, as well as the choice of the scalar quark spectral function. It remains to be seen how these choices reflect the underlying QCD gauge.
71. A.R. Zhitnitsky, Phys. Lett. 329B, 493 (1994).
72. I. M. Gel’fand and G. E. Shilov, Generalized Functions (Academic, New York, 1964), Vol. 1.