|
Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 331-333
|
Interlaboratory differences in method for analysis of manometry explain discrepancies in studies of duodenal phase III peristalsis [1]
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACCURACY;
ANALYTIC METHOD;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX;
DUODENUM MOTILITY;
FLUID TRANSPORT;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LABORATORY TEST;
LETTER;
MANOMETRY;
NORMAL HUMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
STOMACH ANTRUM;
DUODENUM;
HUMANS;
MANOMETRY;
MYOELECTRIC COMPLEX, MIGRATING;
PERISTALSIS;
PRESSURE;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
|
EID: 0038434476
PISSN: 13501925
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.2003.00407.x Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (7)
|