Phase transitions in the two-dimensional random gauge XY model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1045101-1045105

  Holme, Petter ^a   Kim, Beom Jun ^b   Minnhagen, Petter ^a,c  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Ajou University   (South Korea)

^c NORDITA   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; MAGNETISM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0038417037     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. D. A. Huse and H. S. Seung, Phys. Rev. B 42, 1059 (1990).
2. M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1415 (1989); D. S. Fisher, M. P. A. Fisher, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 43, 130 (1991).
3. M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1415 (1989); D. S. Fisher, M. P. A. Fisher, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 43, 130 (1991).
4. M. Cieplak, J. R. Banavar, and A. Khurana, J. Phys. A 3, L145 (1991); M. Cieplak, J. R. Banavar, M. S. Li, and A. Khurana, Phys. Rev. B 45, 786 (1992).
5. M. Cieplak, J. R. Banavar, and A. Khurana, J. Phys. A 3, L145 (1991); M. Cieplak, J. R. Banavar, M. S. Li, and A. Khurana, Phys. Rev. B 45, 786 (1992).
6. J. D. Reger et al., Phys. Rev. B 44, 7147 (1991); C. Wengel and A. P. Young, ibid. 56, 5918 (1997).
7. J. D. Reger et al., Phys. Rev. B 44, 7147 (1991); C. Wengel and A. P. Young, ibid. 56, 5918 (1997).
8. J. M. Kosterlitz and M. V. Simkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1098 (1997).
9. M. J. P. Gingras, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7547 (1992); H. S. Bokil and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3021 (1998); J. M. Kosterlitz and M. Akino, ibid. 81, 4672 (1998).
10. M. J. P. Gingras, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7547 (1992); H. S. Bokil and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3021 (1998); J. M. Kosterlitz and M. Akino, ibid. 81, 4672 (1998).
11. M. J. P. Gingras, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7547 (1992); H. S. Bokil and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3021 (1998); J. M. Kosterlitz and M. Akino, ibid. 81, 4672 (1998).
12. M. P. A. Fisher, T. A. Tokuyasu, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2931 (1991).
13. J. D. Reger and A. P. Young, J. Phys. A 26, L1067 (1993).
14. R. A. Hyman et al., Phys. Rev. B 51, 15 304 (1995).
15. H. Nishimori, Physica A 205, 1 (1994).
16. M. Y. Choi and S. Y. Park, Phys. Rev. B 60, 4070 (1999).
17. Y. H. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1819 (1992).
18. B. J. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 62, 644 (2000).
19. B. J. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 6007 (1997).
20. G. S. Jeon, S. Kim, and M. Y. Choi, Phys. Rev. B 51, 16 211 (1995).
21. J. Maucourt and D. R. Grempel, Phys. Rev. B 56, 2572 (1997).
22. M. Rubinstein, B. Shraiman, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 27, 1800 (1983); T. Natterman et al., J. Phys. 15, 565 (1995); M.-C. Cha and H. A. Fertig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4867 (1995); L.-H. Tang, Phys. Rev. B 54, 3350 (1996).
23. M. Rubinstein, B. Shraiman, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 27, 1800 (1983); T. Natterman et al., J. Phys. 15, 565 (1995); M.-C. Cha and H. A. Fertig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4867 (1995); L.-H. Tang, Phys. Rev. B 54, 3350 (1996).
24. M. Rubinstein, B. Shraiman, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 27, 1800 (1983); T. Natterman et al., J. Phys. 15, 565 (1995); M.-C. Cha and H. A. Fertig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4867 (1995); L.-H. Tang, Phys. Rev. B 54, 3350 (1996).
25. M. Rubinstein, B. Shraiman, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 27, 1800 (1983); T. Natterman et al., J. Phys. 15, 565 (1995); M.-C. Cha and H. A. Fertig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4867 (1995); L.-H. Tang, Phys. Rev. B 54, 3350 (1996).
26. Preliminary results for parallel tempering Monte Carlo give the same qualitative result Ref. 20.
27. P. Olsson, Phys. Rev. B 46, 14 598 (1992); ibid. 52, 4526 (1995).
28. P. Olsson, Phys. Rev. B 46, 14 598 (1992); ibid. 52, 4526 (1995).
29. For more details, see B. J. Kim, P. Minnhagen, and P. Holme (unpublished).
30. This boundary of SI is completely in accord with the change from power-law to exponential decay of the spin-correlation function found in Ref. 16 (Ref. 20). In SII the higher-order correlation function discussed in Ref. 15 has a power-law decay Ref. 20.
31. With the FTBC, the rms current is identically zero.
32. P. Holme and P. Olsson, Europhys. Lett. 60, 439 (2002).
33. However, the data by H. Katzgraber and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 66, 224507 (2002) were found to be consistent with a T = 0 transition.