Deploying NMD: Not whether, but how

Survival

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 6-

  Daalder, Ivo H ^a   Goldgeier, James M ^a   Lindsay, James M ^a  

^a BROOKINGS INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038416880     PISSN: 00396338     EISSN: 14682699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/survival/42.1.6     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Jason Ellis, ‘Nunn-Lugar’s Mid-Life Crisis’, Survival, vol. 39, no. 1, Spring 1997, pp. 84–110.
2. Michael O’Hanlon, ‘Star Wars Strikes Back’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 78, no. 6, November/December 1999, pp. 68–82.
3. Walter B. Slocombe, Remarks to the Center for Strategic and International Studies Statesmen’s Forum (Washington DC: CSIS, 5 November 1999), p. 4, available at http://www.csis.org/html/sf991105Slocombe.html.
4. Walter B. Slocombe, Remarks to the Center for Strategic and International Studies Statesmen’s Forum (Washington DC: CSIS, 5 November 1999., p. 5.
5. George Lewis, Lisbeth Gronlund, and David Wright, ‘National Missile Defense: An Indefensible System’, Foreign Policy, no. 117, Winter 1999–2000, pp. 120–37
6. George N. Lewis, Theodore A. Postol and John Pike, ‘Why National Missile Defense Won’t Work’, Scientific American, August 1999, pp. 36–41.
7. John Donnelly, ‘Cost of Initial NMD to Rise 50 Percent’, Defense Weekly, 20 December 1999.
8. John Donnelly, ‘Cost of Initial NMD to Rise 50 Percent’, Defense Weekly, 20 December 1999.
9. Gen. Larry Welch (ret.), Chairman, Report of the Panel on Reducing Risk in Ballistic Missile Defense Flight Test Programs (Washington DC: Department of Defense, 27 February 1998), p. 9, available at http://fas.org/spp/starwars/program/welch/index.html
10. Gen. Larry Welch (ret.), Chairman, National Missile Defense Review (Washington DC: Department of Defense, November 1999), available at http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/welsh.pdf
11. Bradley Graham, ‘Panel Faults Antimissile Program on Many Fronts’, Washington Post, 14 November 1999. 22 National Intelligence Council, ‘Foreign Missile Developments’, p. 14.
12. Lewis, Postol and Pike, ‘Why National Missile Defense Won’t Work’, p. 40
13. Lewis, Gronlund and Wright, ‘National Missile Defense’, p. 130.
14. John Pomfret, ‘China Warns of New Arms Race’, Washington Post, 11 November 1999
15. Kyl’s remarks in the debate over National Missile Defense Act of 1999, Congressional Record, 15 March 1999, pp. S2640–41.
16. Richard Lowry, ‘Test-Ban Ban’, National Review, 8 November 1999, pp. 20–22
17. Matthew Rees, ‘The Right Thing for Our Country’, Weekly Standard, 25 October 1999, pp. 24–26.
18. Lisbeth Gronlund and George Lewis, ‘How a Limited National Missile Defense Would Impact the ABM Treaty’, Arms Control Today, 29 November 1999, pp. 7–13.
19. Bradley Graham, ‘US to Go Slowly on Treaty’, Washington Post, 8 September 1999; and Rubin, ‘Daily Press Briefing’, p. 7.
20. Ivo H. Daalder, ‘Stepping Down the Thermonuclear Ladder: How Low Can We Go?’, in Ivo H. Daalder and Terry Terriff (eds), Rethinking the Unthinkable: New Directions for Nuclear Arms Control (London: Frank Cass & Co., 1993), pp. 68–102
21. John Steinbruner, ‘National Missile Defense: Collision in Progress’, Arms Control Today, 29 November 1999, pp. 3–6.
22. James M. Goldgeier, Not Whether But When: The US Decision to Enlarge NATO (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999), pp. 108–51