Using flight simulators aboard ships: Human side effects of an optimal scenario with smooth seas

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 74, Issue 5 I, 2003, Pages 497-505

  Muth, Eric R ^a   Lawson, Ben ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cybersickness; Deployable simulators; Embedded simulators; Motion adaptation syndrome; Motion sickness; Sea sickness; Simulator sickness; Un coupled motion; Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BALANCE DISORDER; BALANCE TESTING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYBERSICKNESS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DYNAMIC VISUAL ACUITY TESTING; FLIGHT; FLIGHT SIMULATOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTION ADAPTATION SUNDROME; MOTION SICKNESS; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SAFETY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHIP; SIMULATOR; SIMULATOR SICKNESS; SYMPTOM; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AIRCRAFT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILITARY PERSONNEL; MOTION SICKNESS; NAUSEA; NAVAL MEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0038416076     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baltzley DR, Kennedy RS, Berbaum KS, et al. The time course of postflight simulator sickness symptoms. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 60:1043-8.
2. Bergondy M, Fowlkes J, Baker D. A preliminary analysis of deployed training: issues requirements, and evaluation. Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division Science and Technology Division; 1998. Special Report 98-019.
3. st Annual Interservice/Industry Training Systems and Education Conference. Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division Science and Technology Division; 1999:640-8.
4. Bittner AC, Guignard JC. Human factors engineering principles for minimizing adverse ship motion effects: theory and practice. Naval Engineers J 1985; May:205-13.
5. Brooks T. Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, unabridged [CD], Tracks D1-01 to D1-14, and D2-16 to D2-30 (Duration: 1:03:04; Equivalent to book chapters 1, 2, & 6) New York, NY: Random House Audio Publishing Group, Inc; 1999.
6. Bruner JM. Seasickness in a destroyer escort squadron. United States Armed Forces Med J 1955; 6(4):469-90.
7. Casali JG, Wierwille WW. The effects of various design alternatives on moving-base driving simulator discomfort. Hum Factors 1980; 22:741-56.
8. Cowings PS, Toscano WB, DeRoshia C, Tauson R. Effects of command and control vehicle (CV2) operational environment on soldier health and performance. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2000. NASA/TM-1999-208786.
9. rd Annual Motion Science Consortium Meeting, Potomac Institute for Policy Studies; Arlington, VA; June, 6-7, 2000.
10. Kennedy RS, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Human operator discomfort in virtual reality systems: simulator sickness - causes and cures. In: Kumar S, ed. Advances in industrial ergonomics and safety IV. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis; 1992:1227-34.
11. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993; 3:203-20.
12. Kennedy RS, Lilienthal MG, Berbaum KS, et al. Simulator sickness in U.S. Navy flight simulators. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 60:10-6.
13. Lawson BD, Graeber DA, Mead AM, Muth ER. Signs and symptoms of human syndromes associated with synthetic experiences (SEs). In: Stanney K, ed. The handbook of virtual environments technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2002:681-99.
14. Lawther A, Griffin MJ. Prediction of the incidence of motion sickness from the magnitude, frequency, and duration of vertical oscillation. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82:957-66.
15. th Newsfactor Special Report. Retrieved August 30, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/19242.html.
16. MIL-STD-1472C. Military standard human engineering design criteria for military systems, equipment and facilities. Section 5.8.4 Vibration, Figure 43, 1981; 176.
17. Morales MF. Motion sickness: physical considerations regarding its etiology. In: Panel on Psychology and Physiology, eds. A survey report on human factors in undersea warfare (Ch. 19, pps. 399-414). Washington, DC: Committee on Undersea Warfare National Research Council; 1949.
18. Muth ER, Stern RM, Thayer JF, Koch KL. Assessment of the multiple dimensions of nausea: the nausea profile. J Psychosom Res 1996; 40:511-20.
19. NATOPS General Flight, and Operating Instructions (15 January., OPNAV Instruction 3710.7R). Washington, DC: Department of the Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations; 1997.
20. Probst TH, Schmidt U. The sensory conflict concept for the generation of nausea. J Psychophysiol 1998; 12(suppl 1):34-9.
21. Royal L, Jessen B, Wilkins M. Motion sickness susceptibility in student navigators. Aviat Space Environ Med 1984; 55:277-80.
22. Simes RJ. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1986; 73:751-4.
23. Smith MJ, Cohen BGF, Stammerjohn LW. An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations. Hum Factors 1981; 23:387-400.
24. Strongin TS, Charlton SG. Motion sickness in operational bomber crews. Aviat Space Environ Med 1991; 62:57-9.
25. Tyler DB, Bard P. Motion sickness. Physiol Rev 1949; 29:311-69.
26. Ungs TJ. Simulator induced syndrome: evidence for long-term aftereffects. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 60:252-5.
27. Wertheim AH, Bos JE, Bles W. Contributions of roll and pitch to sea sickness. Brain Res Bull 1999; 47:517-24.