Auditory processing disorder can negate the benefits of binaural amplification

Hearing Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 60-

  Baran, Jane A ^a   Musiek, Frank E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BINAURAL HEARING; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELDERLY CARE; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MONAURAL HEARING; NOTE; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0038392622     PISSN: 07457472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000293300.55616.42     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Chmiel R, Jerger J, Murphy E, et al: Unsuccessful use of binaural amplification by an elderly person. JAAA 1997;8:1-10.
2. Jerger J, Silman S, Lew HL, Chmiel R: Case studies in binaural interference: Converging evidence from behavioral and electrophysiologic measures. JAAA 1993;4:122-131.
3. Musiek FE, Baran JA: Amplification and the central auditory nervous system. In Valente M, ed., Hearing Aids: Standards, Options, and Limitations. New York: Thieme, 1996: 407-437.
4. Stach BA: Hearing aid amplification and central auditory disorders. In Sandlin RE, ed., Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification: Technical and Clinical Considerations, 2nd ed. San Diego: Singular Thomson Learning, 2000: 607-641.
5. Strouse Carter A, Noe CM, Wilson RH: Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids. JAAA 2001;12:261-272.
6. Jerger J: Two ears, two aids? Well, yes and no! JAAA 2001;12(5).