Coherent charging of differentiated services in the Internet depending on congestion control aggressiveness

Computer Communications

Volumn 26, Issue 13 SPEC., 2003, Pages 1445-1456

  Owezarski, Philippe ^a   Larrieu, Nicolas ^a  

^a LAAS CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Charging internet services; Congestion control; Internet QoS; Services differentiation; TCP

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION); FEES AND CHARGES; INTERNET; NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

SERVICES DIFFERENTIATION;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 0038391480     PISSN: 01403664     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-3664(03)00030-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Braden R., Clark D., Shenker S. Integrated services in the Internet architecture: an overview. RFC 1633. June:1994.
2. Black S., Carlson D., Davies M., Davies E., Wang Z., Weiss W. An architecture for differentiated services. RFC 2475. December:1998.
3. Allman M., Paxson V., Stevens W. TCP congestion control. RFC 2581. April:1999.
4. Paxson V., Floyd S. Wide-Area Traffic: the failure of Poisson modeling. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 3:(3):1995.
5. Uhlig S., Bonaventure O. Understanding the long-term self-similarity of Internet traffic. Proceedings of Quality of Future Internet Services Workshop (QoFIS'2001). 2001.
6. Venkatachalam, M., Kaur, J., Vin, H., End-to-End Model for a Flow in the Internet, Proceedings of INFOCOM, 2003 (in press).
7. Crovella M., Bestavros A. Self-similarity in World Wide Web traffic: evidence and possible causes. IEEE/ATM Transactions on Networking. 5:(6):1997.
8. Leland W., Taqqu M., Willinger W., Wilson D. On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic (extended version). IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 1994.
9. Erramilli A., Narayan O., Willinger W. Experimental queueing analysis with long-range dependent traffic. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. April:1996.
10. Wolf R. Stochastic Modeling and the Theory of Queues. 1989;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
11. Floyd S., Handley M., Padhye J., Widmer J. Equation-based congestion control for unicast applications. ACM SIGCOMM. 2000.
12. Stevens W.R. The Protocols. The Protocols. 1994;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
13. Fall K., Floyd S. Simulation-based Comparisons of Tahoe Reno, and SACK TCP. Computer Communication Review. 36:(3):1996.
14. Floyd S., Henderson T. The New Reno modification to TCP's fast recovery algorithm. RFC 2582. April:1999.
15. Mathis M., Mahdavi J., Floyd S., Romanov A. TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options. RFC 2018. October:1999.
16. Jacobson V. Congestion avoidance and control. Proceedings of SIGCOMM'98. August:1998.
17. Floyd S., Fall K. Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet. Transactions on Networking. February:1998.
18. Brakhmo L.S., O'Malley S.W., Peterson L. TCP Vegas: new technique for congestion detection and avoidance. Proceedings Of ACM SIGCOMM'94, London. October:1994.
19. Floyd S., Kohler E., Padhye J. Profile for DCP congestion control ID congestion control ID 3: TFRC congestion control. Internet Draft, IETF. November:2001.
20. Clark D.D., Tennenhouse D.L. Architectural Considerations for a New Generation of Protocols. SIGCOMM Symposium on CommunicationsArchitectures and Protocols, (Philadelphia, PA). September:1990.
21. Owezarski P., Martinie C. Conception et simulation d'une architecture à différenciation de services alternative à DiffServ. Rapport LAAS No. 01447. October:2001;. in French.
22. NetFlow Services Solutions Guide, http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/-cisintwk/intsolns/netflsol/ .
23. S. Axelson, Intrusion detection systems: a survey and taxonomy, Technical report No 99-15, Department of computer enfineering, Chalmers university of technology, Sweden, March 2000.