Are over-simplified views of addiction neuroscience providing too simplified ethical considerations?

Addiction

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 872-873

  Uhl, George R ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; BEHAVIOR; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG EXPOSURE; DRUG INTOXICATION; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEMORY; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; RECURRENT DISEASE;

BRAIN DISEASES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; NEUROSCIENCES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0038391235     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00453.x     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Dolinsky, Z. S. & Babor, T. F. (1997) Ethical, scientific and clinical issues in ethanol administration research involving alcoholics as human subjects. Addiction, 92, 1087-1097.
2. Gorelick, D. A., Montoya, I. D. & Johnson, E. O. (1998) Sociodemographic representation in published studies of cocaine abuse pharmacotherapy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 49, 89-93.
3. Hall, W., Carter, L. & Morley, K. I. (2003) Addiction, neuroscience and ethics. Addiction, 98, 867-870.
4. Uhl, G. R., Liu, O. R. & Naiman, D. (2002) Substance abuse vulnerability loci: converging genome scanning data. Trends in Genetics, 18, 420-425.