In vitro resistance of reinforced interim fixed partial dentures

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 170-174

  Pfeiffer, Peter ^a   Grube, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYETHYLENE; POLYMER; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT; GLASS; GLASS FIBER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; MATERIALS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTAL VENEERS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, TEMPORARY; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYETHYLENE; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0038389116     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.29     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Davidoff SR. Heat-processed acrylic resin provisional restorations: an in-office procedure. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:673-5.
2. Samadzadeh A, Kugel G, Hurley E, Aboushala A. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations reinforced with plasma-treated woven polyethylene fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:447-50.
3. Lastumäki TM, Lassila LV, Vallittu, PK. Flexural properties of the bulk fiber-reinforced composite DC-tell used in fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:22-6.
4. Vallittu PK. A review of methods used to reinforce polymethyl methacry-late resin. J Prosthodont 1995;4:183-7.
5. Vallittu PK. Comparison of the in vitro fatigue resistance of an acrylic resin removable partial denture reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wires. J Prosthodont 1996;5:115-21.
6. Vallittu PK. Ultra-high-modulus polyethylene ribbon as reinforcement for denture polymethyl methacrylate: a short communication. Dent Mater 1997;13:381-2.
7. Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:318-26.
8. Stipho HD. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on some mechanical properties of autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:580-4.
9. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Schneider-Feyrer S, Handel G. In-vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced adhesive fixed partial inlay dentures. J Dent 1999;27:163-8.
10. Vallittu PK. Compositional and weave pattern analyses of glass fibres in dental polymer fiber composites. J Oral Rehabil 1998;7:170-6.
11. Vallittu PK. Comparison of two different silane compounds used for improving adhesion between fibers and acrylic denture base material. J Prosthet Dent 1993;20:533-9.
12. Vallittu PK. Some aspects of the tensile strength of unidirectional glass fibre-polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:100-5.
13. Kilfoil BM, Hesby RA, Pelleu GB Jr. The tensile strength of a composite resin reinforced with carbon fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:40-3.
14. DeBoer J, Vermilyea SG, Brady RE. The effect of carbon fiber orientation on the fatigue resistance and bending properties of two denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:119-21.
15. Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Wellendorf H. Carbon/graphite fiber reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate): properties under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1065-80.
16. Mullarky RH. Aramid fiber reinforcement of acrylic appliances. J Clin Orthod 1985;19:655-8.
17. Berrong JM, Weed RM, Young JM. Fracture resistance of Kevlar-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) resin: a preliminary study. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:391-5.
18. Gutteridge DL. Reinforcement of poly(methyl methacrylate) with ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fiber. J Dent 1992;20:50-4.
19. Ladizesky NH, Ho CF, Chow TW. Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:934-9.
20. Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Acrylic resin-fiber composite - Part I: The effect of fiber concentration on fracture resistance. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:607-12.
21. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992;8:197-202.
22. Goldberg AJ, Freilich MA. An innovative pre-impregnated glass fiber for reinforcing composites. Dent Clin North Am 1999;43;127-33.
23. Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:311-8.
24. Giordano R 2nd. Fiber reinforced composite resin systems. Gen Dent 2000;48:244-9.
25. Vallittu PK. Glass fiber reinforcement in repaired acrylic resin removable dentures: preliminary results of a clinical study. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:39-44.
26. Nohrstrom TJ, Vallittu PK, Yli-Urpo A. The effect of placement and quantity of glass fibers on the fracture resistance of interim fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:72-8.
27. Lavelle CLB. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972;61:29-37.
28. SN EN ISO 10477. Polymer-based crown and bridge materials. Berlin: Beuth, 2000
29. Kayacan R, Ballarini R, Mullen RL. Theoretical study of the effects of tooth and implant mobility differences on occlusal force transmission in tooth/implant-supported partial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:391-9.
30. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Leibrock A, Handel G, Friedl KH. Intraoral repair of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:393-8.