Elasticity of alveolar bone near dental implant-bone interfaces after one month's healing

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1209-1214

  Chang, M C ^a,b   Ko, C C ^a   Liu, C C ^a   Douglas, W H ^a   DeLong, R ^a   Seong, W J ^a   Hodges, J ^a   An, K N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Kunsan National University   (South Korea)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Elasticity; Healing bone; Interface; Nanoindentation

Indexed keywords

BONE; DENTAL PROSTHESES; ELASTIC MODULI; ELASTICITY; INDENTATION; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; TITANIUM;

NOMARSKI DIFFERENTIAL INTERFERENCE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY;

BIOMECHANICS;

ALVEOLAR BONE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRIGHT FIELD MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELASTICITY; IMPLANT; METAL IMPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 0038386256     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00113-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baldwin W.W., Bankston P.W. Measurement of live bacteria by Nomarski interference microscopy and stereologic methods as tested with macroscopic rod-shaped models. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 54(1):1988;105-109.
2. Brunski J.B. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental implant interface. Advances in Dental Research. 13:1999;99-119.
3. Cheng Y.-S., Douglas W.H. Boundary effect of microhardness. Journal of Dental Research. 80(Special Issue):2001;203.
4. Cheng Y.-S., Douglas W.H. Comprehensive boundary effect of microhardness. Journal of Dental Research. 81(Spec. Issue):2002;A471.
5. Craig R.G., Peyton F.A. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 37(4):1958;710-718.
6. Fung Y.C. A First Course in Continuum Mechanics. 2nd Edition:1981;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. Huja S.S., Katona T.R., Moore B.K., Roberts W.E. Microhardness and anisotropy of the vital osseous interface and endosseous implant supporting bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 16:1998;54-60.
8. Ko, C.C., Douglas, W.H., Cheng, Y.S., 1995. Intrinsic mechanical competence of cortical and trabecular bone measured by nanoindentation and microindentation probes. ASME Bioengineering Conference, AMSE-BED-Vol. 29, pp. 415-416.
9. Oliver W.C., Pharr G.M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using loading and displacement sensing indentation experiments. Journal of Materials Research. 7:1992;1564-1583.
10. Rho J.Y., Tsui T.Y., Parr G.M. Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials. 18:1997;1325-1330.
11. Rho J.Y., Zioupos P., Currey J.D., Pharr G.M. Variations in the individual thick lamellar properties within osteons by nanoindentation. Bone. 25(3):1999;295-300.
12. Szmukler-Moncler S., Salama H., Reingewirtz Y., Dubruille J.H. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface. review of experimental literature Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (Applied Biomaterials). 43:1998;192-203.
13. Takayama S., Utsumi K.R., Sasaki Y. Topographic examination of sister chromatid differential staining by Nomarski interference microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Chromosoma (Berl.). 82:1981;113-119.
14. Turner C.H., Rho J., Takano Y., Tsui T.Y., Pharr G.M. The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar. results from two microscopic measurement techniques Journal of Biomechanics. 32:1999;437-441.
15. Zimmerman M.C., Meunier A., Katz J.L., Christel P., Sedel L. The evaluation of bone remodeling about orthopaedic implants with ultrasound. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 7:1989;607-611.
16. Zysset P.K., Guo X.E., Hoffler C.E., Moore K.E., Goldstein S.A. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. Journal of Biomechanics. 32:1999;1005-1012.