How does fishing intensity affect the efficiency of a mercury bioaccumulation model in predicting fish Hg concentration?

Journal De Physique. IV : JP

Volumn 107, Issue II, 2003, Pages 1445-

  Surette, C ^a   Lucotte, M ^a   Harris, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b TETRA TECH INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic mercury cycle; Intensive fishing; Lakes; Mercury bioaccumulation; Modelling; Predator fish

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; LAKES; MARINE BIOLOGY; MARINE POLLUTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DYNAMIC MERCURY CYCLE; INTENSIVE FISHING; MERCURY BIOACCUMULATION; PREDATOR FISH;

MERCURY (METAL);

EID: 0038376078     PISSN: 11554339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20030582     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Colby PJ, Ryan PA, Schupp DH, Serns SL. (1987) Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44 (Suppl 2): 104-128.
2. Hakanson L, Andersson P, Andersson T, Bengtsson A, Grahn P, Johnsson JA, Jönsson CP, Kvarnäs H, Lindgren G, Nilsson A. (1990) Measures to reduce mercury in lake fish. Final report from the liming-mercury-caesium project. (In Swedish. Extended Summary in English) Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Solna Sweden. SNV Report 1990, 3818:1-189.
3. Healey MC. (1980) Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37:255-267.
4. Hudson, RJM, Gherini, SA, Watras, CJ, Porcella DB (1994) In Mercury as a Global Pollutant. (ed. Watras, CJ et Huckabee, JW) Lewis Publishers, p. 473-523.
5. Verta M. (1990) Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47:1888-1897