Distribution of heavy metals in sediment pore water due to offshore discharges: An ecological risk assessment

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 451-461

  Sadiq, R ^a   Husain, T ^b   Bose, N ^b   Veitch, B ^b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^b MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Barite; Exposure; Monte Carlo (MC) simulations; Response; Risk; RQ; SBFs

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRILLING FLUIDS; ECOSYSTEMS; HEAVY METALS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY; SEDIMENTS; WATER POLLUTION;

EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS;

WATER QUALITY;

BARITE; DRILLING FLUID; HEAVY METAL; OFFSHORE ENGINEERING; POREWATER; SEDIMENT POLLUTION;

EID: 0038375033     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00010-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, 1999. National Water Quality Management Strategy, Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council.
2. Booman, C., Foyn, L., 1996. Effects of the Water Soluble Fraction of Crude Oil on Marine Fish Larvae and Crustaceans. In: Reed, M., Johnson, S. (Eds.), Produced Water 2: Environmental Issues and Mitigation Technologies. Environmental Science Research, Vol. 52. Plenum Press, New York.
3. Brandsma, M. G., 1996. Computer Simulations of Oil-Based Mud Cuttings Discharges in the North Sea, The Physical and Biological Effects of Processed Oily Drill Cuttings, E & P Forum Report No. 2.61/202: 25-40.
4. Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment, 1997. A Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment: Technical Appendices, CCME, PN 1274.
5. Diamond, M., 1999. Development of a fugacity/aquivalence model of mercury dynamics in lakes. Water. Air and Soil Pollution 111, 337-357.
6. Diamond, M., Mackay, D., Poulton, D., Stride, F., 1994. Development of a mass balance model of the fate of 17 chemicals in the Bay of Quinte. Journal of Great Lakes Research 20, 643-666.
7. Huang, H., 1992. Transport properties of drilling muds and Detroit river sediments, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
8. Husain, T., Sadiq, R., Mukhtasor, Khan, A.A., 2002. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment: Deterministic and Uncertainty Analyses. In: The Gulf Ecosystem: Health and Sustainability. Elsevier Publishers, pp. 199-218.
9. Lenwood, W.H. Jr., Scott, M.C., Killen, W.D., 1998. Ecological risk assessment of copper and cadmium in surface waters of Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17 (6), 1172-1189.
10. Ling, H., Diamond, M., Mackay, D., 1993. Application of the QWASI fugacity/aquivalence model to assessing sources and fate of contaminants in Hamilton Harbor. Journal of Great Lakes Research 19, 582-602.
11. Lyman, W.J., Reehl, W.F., Rosenblatt, D.H., 1990. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
12. Mackay, D., 1991. Multimedia Environmental Models: The Fugacity Approach. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.
13. Mackay, D., Diamond, M., 1989. Application of the QWASI (quantitative water air sediment interaction) fugacity model to the dynamics of organic and inorganic chemicals in lakes. Chemosphere 18, 1343-1365.
14. Mackay, D., Joy, M., Paterson, S., 1983. A quantitative water, air, sediment interaction (QWASI) fugacity model for describing the fate of chemicals in lakes. Chemosphere 12, 277-291.
15. Mackay, D., Paterson, S., Shiu, W.Y., 1992. Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals. Chemosphere 24, 695-717.
16. Mackay, D., Sang, S., Vlahos, P., Gobas, F., Diamond, M., Dolan, D., 1994. A rate constant model of chemical dynamics in lake ecosystem: PCBs in Lake Ontario. Journal Great Lakes Research 20 (4), 625-642.
17. Meinhold, A.F., 1998. Framework for a comprehensive environmental assessment of drilling fluids. National Petroleum Technology Office, Office of Fossil Energy, US Department of Energy, Tulsa, OK, BNL-66108.
18. Morgan, M.G., Henrion, M., 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
19. Palisade 1997. @RISK, Risk Analysis and Simulation Ad-In for Microsoft Excel, Release 1.1 User's Guide, Palisade Corporation, NY, 14867.
20. Reish, D.J., Geesey, G.G., Kauwling, T.J., Wilkes, F.G., Mearns, A.J., Oshida, P.S., Rossi, S.S., 1980. Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 52, 1533-1575.
21. Reish, D.J., Geesey, G.G., Oshida, P.S., Wilkes, F.G., Mearns, A.J., Rossi, S.S., Ginn, T.C., 1981. Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 53, 925-949.
22. Reish, D.J., Geesey, G.G., Wilkes, F.G., Oshida, P.S., Mearns, A.J., Rossi, S.S., Ginn, T.C., 1982. Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 54, 786-812.
23. Reish, D.J., Kauwling, T.J., Mearns, A.J., 1976. Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 48, 1439-1459.
24. Reish, D.J., Kauwling, T.J., Mearns, A.J., Oshida, P.S., Rossi, S.S., 1977. Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 49, 1316-1340.
25. Reish, D.J., Kauwling, T.J., Mearns, A.J., Oshida, P.S., Rossi, S.S., Wilkes, F.G., Ray, M.J., 1978. Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 50, 1424-1468.
26. Reish, D.J., Rossi, S.S., Mearns, A.J., Oshida, P.S., Wilkes, F.G., 1979. Marine and estuarine pollution. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 51, 1477-1517.
27. Sadiq, R., 2001. Drilling waste discharges in the marine environment: a risk based decision methodology, Ph.D. Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.
28. Sadiq, R., Husain, T., Veitch, B., Bose, N., 2001. Heavy metals distribution in the pore water: a drilling waste case study, in: The Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Conference 2001, 30th May-2nd June, Victoria, Canada.
29. Sadiq, R., Veitch, B., Husain, T., Bose, N., 2000. Synthetic-based drilling fluids discharge in the marine environment: water quality assessment. Third Speciality Conference on Environmental Progress in the Petroleum and Petrochemical Industries, 1-3 May, Bahrain.
30. Seaconsult Marine Research Limited, 2000. Modelled predictions of well cuttings deposition and produced water dispersion of the proposed white rose development. Husky Oil Operations Limited.
31. Sleath, J.F.A., 1984. Seabed mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, Cambridge University.
32. Terra Nova Development Application, 1996. Environmental impact assessment, Petro-Canada.
33. Thatcher, M., Henriquez, L.R., Karman, C.C., 1999. CHARM, An user guide for the evaluation of chemicals used and discharged offshore, Version 1.1, A CIN Revised CHARM Report III.
34. Thiobodeaux, L.J., Reible, D.D., Fang, C.S., 1986. Transport of chemical contaminants in the marine environment originating from offshore drilling bottom deposits - a vignette model. In: Pollutants in Multimia Environment. Plenum Press, pp. 49-64.
35. US EPA, 1976. Quality criteria for water. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C., pp. 256.
36. US EPA, 1993. Development document for effluent limitations guidelines and new source performance standards for the offshore subcategory of the oil and gas extraction point source category. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA-821-R93-003.
37. US EPA, 1995. Development document for effluent limitations guidelines standards for the coastal subcategory of the oil and gas extraction point source category. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA-821-R95-009.
38. US EPA, 1996a. Summary report for the workshop on Monte Carlo analysis, Risk Assessment Forum. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA/630/R-96/010.
39. US EPA, 1996b. The metal translator: guidance for calculating a total recoverable permit limit from a dissolved criterion. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA-823-B-96-007.
40. US EPA, 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment, Risk Assessment Forum. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA-630-R-98-002F.
41. US EPA, 1999a. Environmental assessment of proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for synthetic-based drilling fluids and other non-aqueous drilling fluids in the oil and gas extraction point source category. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA-821-B98-019.
42. US EPA, 1999b. Development documents for proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for synthetic-based drilling fluids and other non-aqueous drilling fluids in the oil and gas extraction point source category. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA-821-B-98-021.
43. US EPA, 1999c. Partition coefficients for metals in surface water, soil, and waste. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.
44. US EPA, 2000. Environmental assessment of final effluent limitations guidelines and standards for synthetic-based drilling fluids and other non-aqueous drilling fluids in the oil and gas extraction point source category. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA-821-00-014.