A qualitative study exploring junior paediatricians', midwives', GPs' and mothers' experiences and views of the examination of the newborn baby

Midwifery

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 37-45

  Bloomfield, Linda ^a   Townsend, Joy ^b   Rogers, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; EXPERIENCE; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GENERAL HOSPITAL; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MIDWIFE; MOTHER; NEWBORN; NEWBORN CARE; NEWBORN SCREENING; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PARENT; PEDIATRICIAN; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCREENING TEST; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TRAINING; UNITED KINGDOM; ADULT; ATTITUDE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN; PREGNANCY; STANDARD;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERVIEWS; MIDWIFERY; MOTHERS; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIANS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 0038362700     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0323     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Burgess R. Elements of sampling in field research. Burgess R. Field research: a sourcebook and field manual. 1994;Routledge, London.
2. Bryman A., Burges R G. Analysing qualitative data. 1994;Routledge, London.
3. Cartlidge P. Routine discharge examination of babies; is it necessary? Archives of Disease in Childhood. 67:1992;1421-1422.
4. Doctors in training a new deal. 1991;Department of Health, London.
5. Changing childbirth: report of the expert maternity group. 1993;HMSO, London.
6. Screening for the detection of congenital dislocation of the hip: report of the expert working party. 1986;HMSO, London.
7. Duff E. Safe in our hands, report of the RCM annual conference 1997 Harrogate. Midwives. 110:1997;34.
8. El-Shazly M., Trainor B., Kernohan W G. Reliability of the Barlow and Ortolani tests for neonatal hip instability. Journal of Medical Screening. 1:1994;165-168.
9. Glazener C., Ramsay C., Campbell M. Neonatal examination and screening trial (NEST): a randomised, controlled, switchback trial of alternative policies for low risk infants. British Medical Journal. 318:1999;627-631.
10. Hall D MB. Health for all children. 1996;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Hall D BM. The role of the neonatal examination. British Medical Journal. 318:1999;619-620.
12. Holloway I., Wheeler S. Sampling. Holloway I., Wheeler S. Qualitative research for nurses. 1996;Oxford, Blackwell Science.
13. Lee T., Skelton R., Skene C. Routine neonatal examination: effectiveness of trainee paediatrician compared with advanced neonatal nurse practitioner. Archives of Disease in Childhood; Fetal and Neonatal edition. 85:2001;F100-104.
14. Lomax A. Expanding the midwife's role in examining the newborn. British Journal of Midwifery. 9:2001;1000-1002.
15. Mackeith N. Who should examine the "normal" neonate? Nursing Times. 91:1995;34-35.
16. Micaelides S. A deeper knowledge. Nursing Times. 91:1995;59-61.
17. Moss G D, Cartlidge P HT, Speidel B D. Routine examination in the neonatal period. British Medical Journal. 32:1991;878-879.
18. Rogers, C, R, Bloomfield, L, Townsend, J, 2003, A Qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and views of extending their role to the routine examination of the newborn baby.
19. Vision 2000: executive summary. 2000;RCM, London.
20. Seymour J. Who checks out? MIDIRS. 5:1995;201-202.
21. Sherliker A R. Changing practice? A review of the neonatal examination. Journal of Child Health Care. 1:1997;168-171.
22. Wolke D., Dave S., Hayes J. Routine examination of the newborn and maternal satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal edition. 86:2002;F155-160.