Stimuli produced by observing responses make rats' ethanol self-administration more resistant to price increases

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 167, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 180-186

  Shahan, Timothy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned reinforcement; Drug cues; Ethanol; Observing response; Rats; Self administration

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MALE; NONHUMAN; OBSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 0038355303     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1390-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ (1996) Modeling drug abuse policy in the behavioral economics laboratory. In: Green L, Kagel J (eds) Advances in behavioral economics (vol 3). Ablex, New York, pp 69-95
2. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Hughes JR (1990) Behavioral economics of drug self-administration: functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sci 47:1501-1510
3. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST (1993) Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:173-192
4. Bienkowski P, Koros E, Kostowski W, Bogucka-Bonikowska A (2000) Reinstatementof ethanol seeking in rats: behavioral analysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 66:123-128
5. Carter BL, Tiffany ST (1999) Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 94:327-340
6. Ciccocioppo R, Angeletti S, Weiss F (2001) Long-lasting resistance to extinction of response reinstatement induced by ethanol-related stimuli: role of genetic ethanol preference. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25:1414-1419
7. DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK, Higgins ST, Hughes JR, Laying MP, Badger G (1993) Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav 60:641-666
8. Dinsmoor JA (1983) Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behav Brain Sci 6:693-728
9. Dinsmoor JA (1985) The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav 43:365-381
10. Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Bromwell MA, Lankford ME, Monterosso JR, O'Brien CP (2002) Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug Alcohol Depend 67:185-191
11. Estes WK (1948) Discriminative conditioning. II. Effects of a pavlovian conditioned stimulus upon a subsequently established operant response. J Exp Psychol 38: 173-177
12. Falk JL (1994) The discriminative stimulus and its reputation: Role in the instigation of drug abuse. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2:43-52
13. Fantino E (1977) Conditioned reinforcement: choice and information. In: Honig WK, Staddon, JER (eds) Handbook of operant behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp 313-339
14. Field M, Duka T (2002) Cues paired with a low dose of alcohol acquire conditioned incentive properties in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology 159:325-334
15. Gaynor ST, Shull RL (2002) The generality of selective observing. J Exp Anal Behav 77:171-187
16. Hursh SR (1980) Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 34:219-238
17. Hursh SR (1984) Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav 42:435-452
18. Hursh SR, Raslear TG, Shurtleef D, Bauman R, Simmons L (1988) A cost benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav 50:419-440
19. Johnsen BH, Laberg JC, Cox WM, Vaksdal A, Hugdahl K (1994) Alcoholic subjects' attentional bias in the processing of alcohol-related words. Psychol Addict Behav 8:111-115
20. Katner SN, Magalong BS, Weiss FW (1999) Reinstatement of alcohol-seeking behavior by drug-associated discriminative stimuli after prolonged extinction in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 20:471-479
21. Kelleher RT, Riddle WC, Cook L (1962) Observing responses in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 5:3-13
22. Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
23. Krank MD (1989) Environmental signals for ethanol enhance free-choice ethanol consumption. Behav Neurosci 103:365-372
24. Lieberman DA (1972) Secondary reinforcement and information as determinants of observing behavior in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Learn Motiv 3:341-358
25. Lubman DI, Peters LA, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Deakin JFW (2000) Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychol Med 30:169-175
26. Ludwig AM, Wikler A, Stark LH (1974) The first drink: psychobiological aspects of craving. Arch Gen Psychiatry 30:539-547
27. Med-Associates (1999) Med-PC for Windows. Med-Associates, St Albans, Vt., USA
28. Morse WH, Skinner BF (1958) Some factors involved in the stimulus control of operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 1:103-107
29. National Research Council (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
30. Nevin JA, Tota ME, Torquato RD, Shull RL (1990) Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? J Exp Anal Behav 53:359-379
31. Panlilio LV, Weiss SJ, Schindler CW (2000) Effects of compounding drug-related stimuli: escalation of heroin self-administration. J Exp Anal Behav 73:211-224
32. Rachlin H, Green L, Kagel J, Battalio R (1976) Economic demand theory and psychological studies of choice. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation (vol 10). Academic Press, New York, pp 129-154
33. Ranaldi R, Roberts DCS (1996) Initiation, maintenance and extinction of cocaine self-administration with and without conditioned reward. Psychopharmacology 128:89-96
34. Rescorla RA, Solomon RL (1967) Two-process learning theory: relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychol Rev 74:151-182
35. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247-291
36. Ryan F (2002) Detected, selected, and sometimes neglected: Cognitive processing of cues in addiction. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 10:67-76
37. Samson HH (1986) Initiation of ethanol reinforcement using a sucrose-substitution procedure in food- and water-sated rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 10:436-442
38. Samuelson PA, Nordhaus WD (1985) Economics. McGraw-Hill, New York
39. Shahan TA (2002a) The observing-response procedure: a novel method to study drug-associated conditioned reinforcement. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 10:3-9
40. Shahan TA (2002b) Observing behavior: Effects of rate and magnitude of primary reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 78:161-178
41. Spear DJ, Katz JL (1991) Cocaine and food as reinforcers: effects of reinforcement magnitude and response requirement under second-order fixed-ratio and progressive ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 56:261-275
42. Stewart J, de Wit H, Eikelboom R (1984) Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev 91:251-268
43. Townshend JM, Duka T (2001) Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology 157:67-74
44. Weiss SJ (1978) Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav 30:361-381
45. Wikler A (1948) Recent progress in research on the neurophysiological basis of morphine addiction. Am J Psychiatry 105:329-338
46. Williams BA (1988) Reinforcement, choice, and response strength. In: Atkinson RC, Herrnstein, RJ (eds) Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (vol 1): perception and motivation (2nd edn). Wiley, Oxford, pp 167-244
47. Woods JH, Winger GD (2002) Observing responses maintained by stimuli associated with cocaine or remifentanil reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 163:345-351
48. Wyckoff LB (1952) The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychol Rev 59:431-442