Coupling classical and quantum variables using continuous quantum measurement theory

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 81, Issue 14, 1998, Pages 2846-2849

  Diósi, Lajos ^a   Halliwell, Jonathan J ^b  

^a WIGNER RESEARCH CENTRE FOR PHYSICS   (Hungary)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038352426     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2846     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. C. Moller, in Les Theories Relativistes de la Gravitation, A. Lichnerowicz and M. A. Tonnelat (CNRS, Paris, 1962);
2. L. Rosenfeld, Nucl. Phys., 40, 353 (1963).
3. L. H. Ford, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 144, 238 (1982).
4. C-I. Kuo, and L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 4510 (1993).
5. T. W. B. Kibble, in Quantum Gravity 2: A Second Oxford Symposium, C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, New York, 1981).
6. D. N. Page, and C. D. Geilker, Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 979 (1981).
7. A. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 621 (1995);
8. A. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 4090 (1996);
9. A. Anderson, in Proceedings of the Fourth Drexel Symposium on Quantum Nonintegrability, D. H. Feng (International Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996).
10. I. V. Aleksandrov, Z. Naturforsch., 36A, 902 (1981);
11. W. Boucher, and J. Traschen, Phys. Rev. D, 37, 3522 (1988);
12. Ph. Blanchard, and A. Jadcyk, Phys. Lett. A, 175, 157 (1993);
13. K. R. W. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 4087 (1996);
14. L. Diósi, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 4088 (1996);
15. I. R. Senitzky, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 4089 (1996).
16. L. Diósi, quant-ph/9510028.
17. A. Zoupas, “Coupling of Quantum to Classical in the Presence of a Decohering Environment,” Imperial College, 1997 (to be published).
18. M. Gell-Mann, and J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 3345 (1993);
19. E. Joos, and H. D. Zeh, Z. Phys. B, 59, 223 (1985);
20. W. Zurek, Prog. Theor. Phys., 89, 281 (1993);
21. W. Zurek, Phys. Today, 40, 36 (1991).
22. J. J. Halliwell, Phys. Rev. D, (to be published).
23. L. Diósi, Phys. Rev. A, 42, 5086 (1990).
24. A. Barchielli, L. Lanz and G. M. Prosperi, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis., 72B, 79 (1982);
25. V. P. Belavkin, and P. Staszewski, Phys. Rev. A, 45, 1347 (1992).
26. C. M. Caves, and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A, 36, 5543 (1987).
27. L. Diósi, Phys. Lett. A, 129, 419 (1988).
28. B. L. Hu, and A. Matacz, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 1577 (1995);
29. A. Campos, and E. Verdaguer, Phys. Rev. D, 53, 1927 (1996).
30. L. Diósi, Phys. Lett. A, 132, 233 (1988);
31. N. Gisin, and I. C. Percival, J. Phys. A, 26, 2233 (1993);
32. N. Gisin, I. C. Percival, J. Phys. A, 26, 2245 (1993);
33. I. C. Percival, J. Phys. A, 27, 1003 (1994);
34. Y. Salama, and N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A, 181, 269 (1993).
35. J. J. Halliwell, and A. Zoupas, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 7294 (1995);
36. J. J. Halliwell, A. Zoupas, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 4697 (1997).
37. L. Diósi, Phys. Lett. A, 105, 199 (1984).
38. L. Diósi, Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 8, 309 (1996);
39. L. Diósi, in New Developments on Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics, M. Ferrero and A. van der Merwe (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997), p. 115.
40. N. Gisin, Helv. Phys. Acta, 62, 363 (1989).
41. J. J. Halliwell, gr-qc/9808071.