A comparison between radar imagery and coupled wave-current model results for a study of northwest Pacific seamont trapped waves

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Lin, R Q ^a   Chubb, S R ^b  

^a NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

^b NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coupled wave current model; Detect ability; Radar image; SAR; Seamount trapped waves

Indexed keywords

COASTAL CURRENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOW MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; REMOTE SENSING; SEAMOUNT; SURFACE WAVE; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR; WAVE-CURRENT INTERACTION;

(NORTHWEST); PACIFIC OCEAN;

EID: 0038346818     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bell, T. H., A. B. Mays, and W. P. DeWitt, A Compilation of Density and Brunt-Väisälä Frequency Distributions for the Upper 500 m of the World Ocean, vol. II, Tables, Naval Res. Lab., Washington, D. C., 1974.
2. Brink, K. H., The effect of stratification on seamount-trapped waves, Deep Sea Res., 36, 825-844, 1988.
3. Chapman, D., Enhanced subinertial diurnal tides over isolated topographic features, Deep Sea Res., 36, 815-824, 1989.
4. Chelomei, V. N., et al., Studies of the sea surface using the Kosmos-1870 High-Resolution Radar, Sov. J. Remote Sens., 8(2), 306-321, 1990.
5. Cooper, A. L., S. R. Chubb, M. A. Sletten, and C. L. Trump, On the origin of bright lines and other features in X-band radar imagery of frontal surface velocity fields, in Proceedings of 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS'00), vol. III, pp. 1286-1288, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2000.
6. Gasparovic, R. F., J. R. Apel, and E. S. Kasischke, An overview of the SAR internal wave signature experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 12,304-12,316, 1988.
7. Haidvogel, D., and B. Aike, Numerical Ocean Circulation Modeling, 318 pp., World Sci., River Edge, N. J., 1999.
8. Jensen, R., D. Resio, R.-Q. Lin, G. Van Vledder, T. Herbers, and B. Tracy, A Report of the international competition in nonlinear source function simulation in ONR held base enhancement wave prediction, report, Off. of Naval Res., Washington, D. C., 1998.
9. Komen, G. J., L. Cavaleri, M. Donelan, K. Hasselmann, S. Hasselmann, and P. A. E. M. Janssen, Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves, 532 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1994.
10. Lin, R.-Q., and N. Huang, The Goddard Coastal Wave Model I, Numerical method, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 833-847, 1996a.
11. Lin, R.-Q., and N. Huang, The Goddard Coastal Wave Model I, Kinematics, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 848-862, 1996b.
12. Lin, R.-Q., and W. Perrie, A new coastal wave model, III, Nonlinear wave-wave interaction, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1813-1826, 1997.
13. Lin, R.-Q., and W. Perrie, Wave-wave interactions in finite depth water, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 11,193-11,213, 1999.
14. Thompson, D. R., Calculation of radar backscatter modulations from internal waves, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 12,371-12,380, 1988.
15. Thompson, D. R., B. L. Gotwols, and R. E. Sterner II, A comparison of measured surface wave spectral modulations with predictions from a wave-current interaction model, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 12,339-12,343, 1988.
16. Zhang, X., and D. L. Boyer, Current deflections in the vicinity of multiple seamounts, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 8, 1122-1138, 1991.