Evaluation of the permeability of pancreaticogastric anastomoses (PGA) with dynamic magnetic resonance pancreatography after secretin stimulation (secretin MRCP)

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 563-570

  Aube C ^a   Lebigot, J ^a   Pessaux, P ^a   Tuech, J J ^a,c   Kapel, N ^b   Burtin, P ^a   Arnaud, J P ^a   Caron, C ^a  

^a ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c CENTRE PAUL STRAUSS   (France)

Author keywords

Fast magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreatic duct; Pancreatic function; Pancreaticogastric anastomosis; Secretin

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; ELASTASE; SECRETIN;

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; ATROPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ENDOCRINE FUNCTION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSULIN BLOOD LEVEL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS FUNCTION; PANCREAS INSUFFICIENCY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; EXOCRINE PANCREATIC INSUFFICIENCY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PERMEABILITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SECRETIN; STOMACH;

EID: 0038343111     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-002-0065-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Takano S, Ito Y, Watanabe Y, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2000;87:423-427
2. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995;222:580-592
3. Lemaire E, O'Toole D, Sauvanet A, et al. Functional and morphological changes in the pancreatic remnant following pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastric anastomosis. Br J Surg 2000;87:434-438
4. Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K, et al. Pancreatic enzyme activity after a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy reconstructed with pancreaticogastrostomy. Pancreas 1995;11:276-282
5. Arnaud JP, Casa C, Serra-Maudet V, et al. Anastomose pancréatogastrique après duodénopancréatectomie céphalique. A propos de 36 cas. Chirurgie 1993-1994;119(6-7):317-319
6. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997;203:435-441
7. Heuck A, Maubach PA, Reiser M, et al. Age-related morphology of the normal pancreas on computed tomography. Gastrointest Radiol 1987;12:18-22
8. Löser C, Möllgaard A, Fölsch UR. Faecal elastase 1: a novel, highly sensitive, and specific tubeless pancreatic function test. Gut 1996;39:580-586
9. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1183-1197
10. Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A, Pesendorfer FX. Imaging findings of pancreaticobiliary duct diseases with single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR 1997;168:453-459
11. Cappeliez O, Delhaye M, Devière J, et al. Chronic pancreatitis: evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2000;215:358-664
12. Sho M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, et al. A new evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy using secretin magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 1998;176:279-282
13. Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Yokohata K, et al. Long-term morphological changes of remnant pancreas and biliary tree after pancreatoduodenectomy on CT. Int Surg 1998;83:136-140
14. Gregg JA, Sharma MM. Endoscopic measurement of pancreatic juice secretory flow rate and pancreatory pressures after secretin administration in human controls and in patients with acute relapsing pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 1978;136:569-574
15. Hashimoto N, Fujiwara H, Nomura H, Ohyanagi H. In vivo evaluation of long-term patency of pancreaticoenterostomy after Whipple operation. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:866-868
16. Amano H, Takada T, Ammofi BJ, et al. Pancreatic duct patency after pancreaticogastrostomy: long-term follow-up study. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:2382-2387
17. Ishizu H, Takahashi M, Kondo Y, et al. The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after resection of the pancreas. Surg Today 1997;27:285-287
18. Heverhagen JT, Müller D, Battmann A, et al. MR hydrometry to assess exocrine function of the pancreas: Initial results of non invasive quantification of secretion. Radiology 2001;218:61-67
19. Mackie JA, Rhoads JE, Park CD. Pancreaticogastrostomy: a further evaluation. Ann Surg 1975;181:541-545
20. Gall FP, Zinrngibl H, Gebhardt C, Schneider MU. Duodenal pancreatectomy with occlusion of the pancreatic duct. Hepatogastroenterology 1990;37:290-294