Cytologic features of small-cell carcinoma on ThinPrep®

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 8-12

  Bavikatty, Neil R ^a   Michael, Claire W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytology; Fine needle aspiration; Small cell carcinoma; ThinPrep

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYTOPLASM; DATA ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; LUNG SMALL CELL CANCER; MCNEMAR TEST; NUCLEOLUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CARCINOMA, SMALL CELL; FEMALE; HISTOCYTOLOGICAL PREPARATION TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0038339909     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.10297     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Michael CW, Hunter B. Interpretation of fine-needle aspirates processed by the ThinPrep® technique: cytologic artifacts and diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 2000:23:6-13.
2. Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations: nongynecologic cytology evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:368-371.
3. Lee KR, Papillo JL, St John T, Eyerer GJA. Evaluation of the Thin-Prep processor for fine needle aspiration specimens. Acta Cytol 1996; 40:895-899.
4. Biscotti CV, Hollow JA, Toddy SM, Easley KA. ThinPrep versus conventional smear cytologic preparations in the analysis of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:150-153.
5. Biscotti CV, Shorie JH, Gramlich TL, Easley KA. ThinPrep vs. conventional smear cytologic preparations in analyzing fine-needle aspiration specimens from palpable breast masses. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;21:137-141.
6. Fischler DF, Toddy SM. Nongynecologic cytology utilizing the Thin-Prep processor. Acta Cytol 1996;40:669-675.
7. Dey P, Luthra UK, George J, Zuhairy F, George SS, Haji BI. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material. Acta Cytol 2000;44:46-50.
8. Perez-Reyes N, Mulford DK, Rutkowki MA, Logan-Young W, Dawson AE. Breast fine-needle aspiration: a comparison of thin-layer and conventional preparation. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102:349-353.
9. Frost AR, Sidawy MK, Ferfelli M, Tabbara SO, Bronner NA, Brosky KR, Sherman ME. Utility of thin-layer preparations in thyroid fine-needle aspiration: diagnostic accuracy, cytomorphology, and optimal sample preparation. Cancer Cytopathol 1998;84:17-25.
10. Hoerl HD, Schink J, Hartenbach E, Wagner JL, Kurtycz DFI. Exfoliative cytology of primary poorly differentiated (small-cell) neuroendocfine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in ThinPrep material: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:14-18.
11. Hees K, Lebeau PB. Comparison of conventional and ThinPrep preparations of mucoid cytology samples. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;12:181-185.