Lost sunspot cycle in the beginning of Dalton minimum: New evidence and consequences

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 29, Issue 24, 2002, Pages

  Usoskin, I G ^a   Mursula, K ^b   Kovaltsov, G A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c IOFFE INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTH SCIENCES; GEOPHYSICS;

COSMOGENIC ISOTOPES; CYCLE LENGTH; HISTORICAL DATA; PHASE EVOLUTIONS; SOLAR ACTIVITY; SOLAR CYCLE; SUNSPOT CYCLES;

SOLAR ENERGY;

EID: 0038325764     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: 19448007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002GL015640     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 10Be records, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett., 150, 453-462, 1997.
2. 10Be in polar ice to trace the 11-year cycle of solar activity, Nature, 347, 164-166, 1990.
3. Beer, J., Long-term indirect indices of solar variability, Space Sci. Rev., 94, 53-66, 2000.
4. Gnevyshev, M. N., and, A. I. Ohl, On the 22-year cycle of solar activity, Astron. Zh., 25 (1), 18-20, 1948.
5. Hoyt, D. V., and, K. Schatten, Group sunspot numbers: A new solar activity reconstruction, Solar Phys., 179, 189-219, 1998.
6. Kremliovsky, M. N., Can we understand time scales of solar activity? Solar Phys, 151, 351-370, 1994.
7. Krivský, L., and, K. Pejml, World list of polar aurorae <55° and their secular variations, Astron. Inst. Czech. Acad. Sci., 75, 32-68, 1988.
8. Letfus, V., Daily relative sunspot numbers 1749-1848: Reconstruction of missing observations, Solar Phys., 184, 201-211, 1999.
9. Mursula, K., I. G. Usoskin, and, G. A. Kovaltsov, Persistent 22-year cycle in sunspot activity: Evidence for a relic solar magnetic field, Solar Phys., 198, 51-56, 2001.
10. Polygiannakis, J. M., X. Moussas, and, C. P. Sonett, A nonlinear RLC solar cycle model, Solar Phys., 163, 193-203, 1996.
11. Rozelot, J. P., On the stability of the 11-year solar cycle period (and a few others), Solar Phys., 149, 149-154, 1994.
12. Serre, T., and, E. Nesme-Ribes, Nonlinear analysis of solar cycles, Astron. Astrophys., 360, 319-330, 2000.
13. Silverman, S. M., The visual aurora as a predictor of solar activity, J. Geophys. Res., 88 (A10), 8123-8128, 1983.
14. Solanki, S. K., and, M. Fligge, Evolution of the Sun's large-scale magnetic field since the Maunder minimum, Nature, 408, 445-447, 2000.
15. Sonett, C. P., The great solar anomaly ca. 1780-1800-an error in compiling the record, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3225-3228, 1983.
16. Usoskin, I. G., K. Mursula, and, G. A. Kovaltsov, Sunspot activity during the Maunder minimum, Astron. Astrophys., v.354, L33-L36, 2000.
17. Usoskin, I. G., K. Mursula, and, G. A. Kovaltsov, Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century? Astron. Astrophys., 370, L31-L34, 2001.
18. Usoskin, I. G., K. Mursula, and, G. A. Kovaltsov, Simulation of sunspot activity during active Sun and great minima using regular, random and relic fields, Solar Phys., 199, 187-199, 2001 a.
19. Usoskin, I. G., K. Mursula, S. Solanki, M. Schüssler, and, G. A. Kovaltsov, Physical reconstruction of cosmic ray intensity since 1610, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (A11), SSH 13-1-SSH 13-6, doi: 10.1029/2002JA009343, 2002.
20. Vitinsky, Yu. I., M. Kopecky, and, G. V. Kuklin, Statistics of Sunspot Activity, 297 pp., Nauka, Moscow, 1986.
21. Waldmeier, M., The Sunspot Activity in the Years 1610-1960, Zurich Schulthess & Company AG, Zurich, 1960.
22. Wilson, R. M., Bimodality and the Hale cycle, Solar Phys., 117, 269-278, 1988.