Patterns of diversity in boreal mire margin vegetation

Suo

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 17-28

  Korpela, Leila ^a   Reinikainen, Antti ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Boreal forest; Peatland; Structural diversity; Vegetation diversity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038322459     PISSN: 00395471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L. & Jalas, J. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici 5: 169-211.
2. Eurola, S. 1962. Über die regionale Einteilung der südfinnischen Moore. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae 'Vanamo' 33(2): 1-243.
3. Eurola, S. & Holappa, K. 1985. The Finnish mire type system. Aquilo Ser Botanica 21: 101-110.
4. Eurola, S., Hicks, S. & Kaakinen, E. 1984. Key to Finnish Mire Types. In: Moore, P. (ed.), European Mires. pp. 11-117. Academic Press, London.
5. Eurola, S., Huttunen, A. & Kukko-Oja, K. 1994. Suokasvillisuusopas. Oulanka Reports 13. University of Oulu. 81 pp.
6. Hämet-Ahti, L., Suominen, J., Ulvinen, T., Uotila, P. & Vuokko, S. (eds.) 1986. Retkeilykasvio. Suomen Luonnonsuojelun Tuki, Helsinki. 598 pp.
7. Heikurainen, L. 1954. Korpisuus ruskorämeillä. Luonnon Tutkija 58: 42-48.
8. Heikurainen, L. & Pakarinen, P. 1982. Mire vegetation and site types. In: Laine, J., (ed.). Peatlands and their utilization in Finland, pp. 14-23. Finnish Peatland Society, Helsinki.
9. Helliwell, D. R. 1978, Floristic diversity in some central Swedish forests. Forestry 51: 151-161.
10. Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN - A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 90 pp.
11. Hotanen, J-P. 1989. Korpirämeet ja korvet suomalaisessa suoluokitusjärjestelmässä (Summary: The place of spruce-pine mires and oligotrophic spruce mires in Finnish peatland site type classifications). Suo 40: 21-30.
12. Hotanen, J-P. & Nousiainen, H. 1990. Metsä- ja suokasvillisuuden numeerisen ryhmittelyn ja kasvupaikkatyyppien rinnastettavuus (Summary: The parity between numerical units and site types of forest and mire vegetation). Folia Forestalia 763: 1-54.
13. Ilvessalo, Y. 1956. Suomen metsät vuosista 1921-24 vuosiin 1951-53. Kolmeen valtakunnan metsien inventointiin perustuva kuvaus (Summary: The forests of Finland from 1921-24 to 1951-53. A survey based on three national forest inventories). Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 47(1): 1-227.
14. Jeglum, J. K. 1991. Definition of trophic classes in wooded peatlands by means of vegetation types and plant indicators. Annales Botanici Fennici 28: 175-192.
15. Kalela, A. 1961. Waldvegetationszonen Finnlands und ihre klimatischen Paralleltypen. Archium Societatis Vanamo 16 (Suppl.): 65-83.
16. Kalliola, R. 1973. Suomen kasvimaantiede. WSOY, Porvoo -Helsinki. 308 pp.
17. Koponen, T., Isoviita, P. & Lammes, T. 1977. The bryophytes of Finland: An annotated cheklist. Flora Fennica 6:1-77.
18. Kuusipalo, J. 1984. Diversity pattern of the forest understorey vegetation in relation to some site characteristis. Silva Fennica 18: 121-131.
19. Lähde, E., Laiho, O., Norokorpi, Y. & Saksa, T. 1991. The structure of advanced virgin forests in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 6: 527-537.
20. Lindholm, T. & Tuominen, S. 1989. Vanhojen luonnonmetsien rakennetyypit eräilla eteläboreaalisilla luonnonsuojelualueilla (Summary: The structure classes of southern boreal natural forests in some Finnish nature protection areas). Folia Forestalia 736: 46-52.
21. Lumiala, O. 1937. Kasvimaantieteellisiä ja pintamorfologisia suotutkimuksia Luoteis-Karjalasssa (Referat: Pflanzengeographische und obermorfologische Mooruntersuchungen im nordwestlichen Karelien). Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae Vanamo 10(1): 1-115.
22. Malmer, N. 1985. Remarks to the classification of mire vegetation - Scandinavian arguments. Aquilo Ser. Botanica 21: 9-17.
23. Økland, R. H. 1990. A phytogeographical study of the Northern Kisselbergsmosen, SE Norway. III Diversity and habitat niche relationships. Nordic Journal of Botany 10: 191-220.
24. Oksanen, J. 1986. Succesion, dominance and diversity in lichen-rich pine forest vegetation in Finland. Holarctic Ecology 9: 261-266.
25. Pakarinen, P. 1982. Etelä-Suomen suo- ja metsätyyppien numeerisesta luokittelusta. (Summary: Numerical classification of south Finnish mire and forest types). Suo 33: 97-103.
26. Pielou, E.C. 1966. Shannon's Formula as a measure of specific diversity: Its use and misuse. American Nature 100: 463-465.
27. Reinikainen, A. 1990. Ecological monitoring as a part of the Finnish National Forest Inventory. In: Proc. of the seminar on ecological statistics. Rome, 28 March-1 April 1988. Annali di Statistica 119 (IX):8, pp. 258-271.
28. Reinikainen, A. & Nousiainen, H. 1985. Biologien työohjeet VMI 8:n pysyviä koealoja varten. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa. Moniste/Mimeographed 42 pp.
29. Reinikainen, A., Lindholm, T. & Vasander, H. 1984. Ecological variation of mire site types in the small kettlehole mire Heinisuo, southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 21: 79-101.
30. Ruuhijärvi, R. 1960. Über die regionale Einteilung der nordfinnische Moore. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae 'Vanamo' 31 (1): 1-360.
31. Ruuhijärvi, R. 1983. The Finnish mire types and their distribution. In:Gore, A.J.P. (ed.), Mires: swamps, bog, fen and moor. Regional studies. Ecosystems of the World. 4 B, pp. 47-67. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
32. Santesson, R. 1993. Lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Sweden and Norway. SBT-förlaget, Lund. 240 pp.
33. Shannon. C.E. & Weaver, W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 117 pp.
34. Sjörs, H. 1948. Myrvegetation i Bergslagen. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 21: 1-299.
35. Ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. CANOCO - A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by partial detrended canonical correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis. TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
36. Tonteri, T. 1994. Species richness of boreal understorey forest vegetation in relation to site type and successional factors. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 53-60.
37. Tonteri, T., Mikkola, K. & Lahti, T. 1990. Compositional gradients in the forest vegetation of Finland. Journal of Vegetation Science 1: 691-698.
38. Tuomikoski, R. 1942. Untersuchungen über die Untervegetation der Bruchmoore in Ostfinnland. I. Zur Methodik der pflanzensoziologischen Systematik. Annales Botanici Societatis Vanamo 7(1): 1-203.
39. Vasander, H. 1984. Effect of forest amelioration on diversity in an ombrotrohic bog. Annales Botanici Fennici 21:7-15.
40. Vasander, H. 1987a. The effect of forest amelioration on the understorey biomass, species richness and diversity of southern boreal Finnish mires. Symposia Biologica Hungarica 35 (1987): 685-698
41. Vasander, H. 1987b. Diversity of understorey biomass in virgin and drained and fertilized southern boreal mires in eastern Fennoscandia. Annales Botanici Fennici 24: 137-153.
42. Vasander, H., Laiho, R. & Laine J. 1996. Changes in species diversity in peatlands drained for forestry. In: Trettin, C. et al. (eds.), Ecology and Management: Forested Wetlands. Lewis Publishers (In press).
43. Yli-Kojola, H. (ed.) 1995. Pysyvien koealojen 3. mittaus 1995. Maastotyön ohjeet. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki. Moniste/Mimeographed. 104 pp.