Remifentanil and eye surgery: A randomised, clinically controlled comparison of propofol/remifentanil anesthesia and propofol/fentanyl/alfentanil anesthesia;Remifentanil og øjenkirurgi: En randomiseret, klinisk kontrolleret sammenligning af propofol/remifentanil-anœstesi og propofol/fentanyl/alfentanil-anœstesi

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 165, Issue 17, 2003, Pages 1774-1778

  Asmussen, Helle ^b   Jørgensen, Lise ^a  

^a International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALFENTANIL; FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; EYE SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT TRANSPORT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SHIVERING; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETINA DETACHMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALFENTANIL; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PIPERIDINES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPOFOL; RETINAL DETACHMENT;

EID: 0038314335     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Egan TD. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacokinet 1995;29:80-94.
2. Hogue CW, Bowdle TA, O'Leary C et al. A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1996;83:279-85.
3. Philip BK, Scuderi PE, Chung F et al. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997;84:515-21.
4. Wuesten R, van Aken H, Glass PSA et al. Assesment of depth of anesthesia and postoperative respiratory recovery after remifentanil- versus alfentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia in patients undergoing ear-nose-throat surgery. Anesthesiology 2001;94:211-7.
5. Cartwright DP, Kvalsvik O, Cassuto J et al. A randomised blind comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil during anesthesia for outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;85:1014-9.
6. Epple J, Kubitz J, Schmidt H. Comparative analysis of costs of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil vs. balanced anaesthesia with isoflurane and fentanyl. Eur J Anaesth 2001;18:20-8.
7. Van Vlymen JM, White PF. Fast-track concept for ambulatory anesthesia. Curr Opin Aaesthesiol 1998;11:607-13.
8. Aldrete JA. The postanesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:89-91.