Letter to the Editors: Cervical cancer screening: High coverage or high quality?

Tropical Medicine and International Health

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 579-

  Bischof, Uta ^a   Chingang, Leslie Che ^a   Razum, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER;

ADVANCED CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LETTER; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MASS SCREENING; NICARAGUA; NOTE; STANDARD; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MASS SCREENING; NICARAGUA; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0038311635     PISSN: 13602276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01063.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Balmer S, Bowens A, Bruce E et al. (2000) Quality Management for Screening: Report to the National Screening Committee, Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds.
2. Claeys P, Gonzalez C, Gonzalez M et al. (2002) Determinants of cervical cancer screening in a poor area: results of a population-based survey in Rivas, Nicaragua. Tropical Medicine and International Health 7, 935-941.
3. Fitzgerald DW & Behets FM (2003) Women's health and human rights in HIV prevention research. Lancet 361, 68-69.
4. Jahn A (2002) Screening - the Trojan horse in preventive medicine? Tropical Medicine and International Health 7, 295-297.
5. Marteau TM, Senior V & Sasieni P (2001) Women's understanding of a 'normal smear test result': experimental questionnaire based study. British Medical Journal 322, 526-528.