Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: Results after 2 years

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 129-135

  Monse Schneider, B ^a,b,d   Heinrich Weltzien, R ^c   Schug, D ^a   Sheiham, A ^b   Borutta, A ^c  

^a Committee of German Doctors ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^d NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amalgam; ART restorations; Dental caries; Deprived communities; MRT

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; DENTAL ALLOY;

ABSENTEEISM; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ASSISTANT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIST; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MOUTH MUCOSA; PRIMARY SCHOOL; SURVIVAL RATE; TOOTH FILLING; TOOTH OCCLUSION; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; METHODOLOGY; PHILIPPINES; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DMF INDEX; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; PHILIPPINES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038305598     PISSN: 03015661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00030.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dental Health Service National monitoring and evaluation dental survey. Philippines: Department of Health; 1998.
2. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phatumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:135-40.
3. Frencken JE, Holmgren C. Atraumatic restorative treatment for dental caries. Nijmegen: STI Book b.v.; 1999.
4. Frencken JE, Holmgren C. Painting the future for ART. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:449-53.
5. Frencken JE, Holmgren C. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:423-30.
6. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ. The residual caries dilemma. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:436-41.
7. Randall RC, Wilson NH. Glass ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999;78:628-37.
8. Smales RJ, Gerke DC, White IL. Clinical evaluation of occlusal glass ionomer, resin and amalgam restorations. J Dent 1990;18:243-9.
9. Holmgren C, Lo E, Hu DY, Wan HC. ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children -results after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;28:314-20.
10. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Glasionomer und Kompomerfüllungen. In: Heidemann, D, editor. Kariologie und Füllungstherapie, 4th edn. München, Wien, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1999. p. 156-72.
11. Mjör IA, Gordan W. A review of the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Int Dent J 1999;49:127-31.
12. Chadwick BL, Dummer PMH, Dunstan FD, et al. What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations. Qual Health Care 1999;8:202-7.
13. Anusavice KJ. Does ART have a place in preservative dentistry? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:442-8.
14. Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods, 4th edn. Geneva, World Health Organisation 1997.
15. Frencken JE, Phatumvanit P, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, van Amerongen E. Manual for the atraumatic restorative treatment approach to control dental caries, 3rd edn. Groningen: WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Services Research; 1997.
16. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Smith MM, Smith SR. The use of caries detector dye in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1989;167:132-4.
17. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. The use of caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment. Br Dent J 1993;174:245-8.
18. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:372-81.
19. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a 3-year community field trial in Thailand - survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:141-5.
20. Hartung J, Elpelt B, Klösener KH. Statistik. Lehr-und Handbuch der Angewandten Statistik, 11th edn München, Oldenbourg 1998.
21. Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen E, Maher R, Groen H. Pain related to different ways of minimal intervention in the treatment of small caries lesions. J Dent Child 2000;67:123-7.
22. van Amerongen WE, Rahimtoola S. Is ART really atraumatic? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:431-5.
23. Hannigan A, O'Mullane D, Barry D, Schäfer F, Roberts AJ. A caries susceptibility classification of tooth surfaces by survival time. Caries Res 2000;34:103-8.
24. Mandari GJ, Truin GJ, van't Hof MA, Frencken JE. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years. Caries Res 2001;35:90-4.
25. Wilkie R, Lidums A, Smales R. Class II glass ionomer cement tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. Am J Dent 1993;6:181-4.
26. Mallow PK, Durward CS, Klaipo M. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Int Paediat Dent 1998;8:35-40.