Qubits from number states and Bell inequalities for number measurements

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Larsson, Jan Ake ^a  

^a Department of Mathematical Sciences   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGHT AMPLIFIERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY;

BELL INEQUALITIES; BIPARTITE SYSTEM; QUBITS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0038303046     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. J.S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
2. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
3. D. Kaszlikowski, P. Gnaciński, M. Zukowski, W. Miklaszewski, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4418 (2000).
4. D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002).
5. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
6. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, New York, 1951).
7. J.S. Bell, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 480, 263 (1986).
8. K. Banaszek and K. Wódkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4345 (1998).
9. Z.-B. Chen, J.-W. Pan, G. Hou, and Y.-D. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040406 (2002).
10. J.-Å Larson, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3304 (1998).
11. M.A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, C.A. Seakett, W.M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D.J. Wineland, Nature (London) 409, 791 (2001).
12. J.F. Clauser and M.A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).
13. P. Grangier, M.J. Potasek, and B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3132 (1988).
14. S.M. Tan, D.F. Walls, and M.J. Collett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 252 (1991).
15. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 894 (1992).
16. W.J. Munro and M.D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4412 (1993).
17. B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4941 (1997).
18. T.C. Ralph, W.J. Munro, and R.E.S. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2035 (2000).
19. E.H. Huntington and T.C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012306 (2002).
20. B. Julsgaard, A. Kozhekin, and E.S. Polzik, Nature (London) 413, 400 (2001).
21. In a situation like this, one should really deal with states in the form of functionals an operators and weak convergence, but perhaps this would lead us astray in our search for a Bell inequality.
22. A technical note is that the first inequality of (50) cannot be violated by quantum mechanics; while the triangle inequality is used there too (it is also the basis of the Bell inequality), it is used to split commuting measurements rather than noncommuting ones.