Explanation of vegetation succession in subtropical southern China based on ecophysiological characteristics of plant species

Tree Physiology

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 641-648

  Gao, Qiong ^a   Peng, Shaolin ^b   Zhao, Ping ^b   Zeng, Xiaoping ^b   Cai, Xian ^b   Yu, Mei ^c   Shen, Weijun ^b   Liu, Yinghui ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTH CHINA INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Assimilation; Model; Photosynthesis; Stomatal conductance

Indexed keywords

ECOPHYSIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; SUCCESSION; TRANSPIRATION;

(SOUTH); CHINA;

EID: 0038300937     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/23.9.641     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aphalo, P.J. and P.G. Jarvis. 1991. Do stomata respond to relative humidity? Plant Cell Environ. 14:127-132.
2. Aphalo, P.J. and P.G. Jarvis. 1993. An analysis of Ball's empirical model of stomatal conductance. Ann. Bot. 72:321-327.
3. Ball, J.T., I.E. Woodrow and J.A. Berry. 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In Progress in Photosynthesis Research. Ed. J. Biggins. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 221-224.
4. Cai, X., S. Peng, X. Zeng, Z. Yu, P. Zhao and H. Ren. 1995. The characteristics of physiology for five native species in Heshan. Acta Ecol. Sin. 15:73-81.
5. Caldwell, M.M., T.E. Dawson and J.H. Richards. 1998. Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia 113:151-161.
6. Campbell, G.S. and J.M. Norman. 1998. An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 286 p.
7. 4 plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 19:519-538.
8. Dang, Q.L., H.A. Margolis and G.J. Collatz. 1998. Parameterization and testing of a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model for boreal trees. Tree Physiol. 18:141-153.
9. De Lillis, M. and G.C. Sun. 1990. Stomatal response patterns and photosynthesis of dominant trees in a tropical monsoon forest. Acta Oecol. 11:545-555.
10. Dewar, R.C. 1995. Interpretation of an empirical model for stomatal conductance in terms of guard cell function. Plant Cell Environ. 18:365-372.
11. 4 grasses. Agric. For. Meteorol. 67:269-290.
12. Farquhar, G.B. and S.C. Wong. 1984. An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11:191-210.
13. Franks, P.J., I.R. Cowan and G.D. Farquhar. 1997. The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant Cell Environ. 20:142-145.
14. Friend, A.D. 1991. Use of a model of photosynthesis and leaf microenvironment to predict optimal stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen partitioning. Plant Cell Environ. 14:895-906.
15. Gao, Q., P. Zhao, X. Zeng, X. Cai and W. Shen. 2002. A model of stomatal conductance to quantify the relationship between plant transpiration and microclimate and soil water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25:1373-1381.
16. 3-cycle intermediates, photorespiration and Rubisco activation. Plant Cell Environ. 14:881-893.
17. Harper, J.L. 1987. Self-effacing art: restoration as imitation of nature. In Restoration Ecology: a Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Eds. W.R. Jordon, III, N. Gilpin and J. Aber. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 35-45.
18. Jacobs, C.M.J., B.J.J.M. Vandenhurk and H.A.R. Debruin. 1996. Stomatal behaviour and photosynthetic rate of unstressed grape-vines in semi-arid conditions. Agric. For. Meteorol. 80:111-134.
19. Johnson, I.R., J.J. Melkonian, J.H.M. Thornley and S.J. Riha. 1991. A model of water flow through plants incorporating shoot-root message control of stomatal conductance. Plant Cell Environ. 14:531-544.
20. Kemp, P.R., J.F. Reynolds, Y. Pachepsky and J.-L. Chen. 1997. A comparative modelling study of soil water dynamics in a desert ecosystem. Water Resour. Res. 33:73-90.
21. Lhomme, J.P., E. Elguero, A. Chehbouni and G. Boulet. 1998. Stomatal control of transpiration: examination of Monteith's formulation of canopy resistance. Water Resour. Res. 34:2301-2308.
22. Long, S.P. and P.R. Hutchin. 1991. Primary production in grasslands and coniferous forests with climate change: an overview. Ecol. Appl. 1:139-156.
23. Margolis, H.A. and M.G. Ryan. 1997. A physiological basis for biosphere-atmosphere interactions in the boreal forest: an overview. Tree Physiol. 17:491-499.
24. Muchow, R.C. 1985. Stomatal behavior in grain legumes grown under different soil water regimes in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crop Res. 11:291-307.
25. 2 enrichment (FACE). Plant Cell Environ. 20:1041-1050.
26. Peng, S. 1996. Southern subtropical forest community dynamics. Science Press China, Beijing, 444 p.
27. Tezara, W., M.D. Fernandez, C. Donoso and A. Herrera. 1998. Seasonal changes in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of five plant species from a semiarid ecosystem. Photosynthetica 35:399-410.
28. Thornley, J.M. and I.R. Johnson. 1990. Plant and crop modelling. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 676 p.
29. Yu, Z. and S. Peng. 1996. Ecological studies on vegetation rehabilitation of tropical and subtropical degraded ecosystems. Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou, 266 p.
30. Zeng, X., P. Zhao, S. Peng, Z. Yu and X. Cai. 1999. Physiological characteristics of three species of pine. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:275-278.
31. Zhao, P., Z. Yu and X. Zeng. 1996. Diurnal variation in net photosynthetic rate and respiration rate of plant leaf under natural conditions. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2:340-346.